Skip to content

Differential Equations for Relativity

Scrollable formula. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal hidden content.

Scrollable table. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal additional columns.

Scrollable figure. Use Left and Right arrow keys to inspect hidden content.

Ordinary differential equations enter relativity as geodesic equations, background evolution, radial structure, separated wave equations, and perturbative transport. The essential skill is not memorizing solution forms: it is identifying the problem type, stating the data that make it well posed, choosing an appropriate analytic or numerical method, and checking the result. This module develops that skill through focused examples.

Required background. Calculus and Linear Algebra for Relativity supplies differentiation, eigenstructure, linear systems, and basis changes.

You should leave able to solve representative initial-value, boundary-value, and asymptotic ODEs and to justify a method in a gravitational application.

  1. Solve y′+2y=e−ty'+2y=e^{-t} with y(0)=0y(0)=0, and verify the differential equation directly.
  2. For y′′+ω2y=0y''+\omega^2y=0 on 0≤x≤L0\le x\le L, explain the difference between prescribing y(0),y′(0)y(0),y'(0) and prescribing y(0),y(L)y(0),y(L). Under the boundary conditions y(0)=y(L)=0y(0)=y(L)=0, for which ω\omega are nonzero solutions possible?
  3. Use a Frobenius ansatz y=xs∑n=0∞anxny=x^s\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nx^n to find the indicial exponents of x2y′′+xy′−ν2y=0.x^2y''+xy'-\nu^2y=0.
  4. Linearize z˙=λz−z3\dot z=\lambda z-z^3 about every equilibrium and classify its stability for λ>0\lambda\gt0.
Hints for 1

Use the integrating factor e2te^{2t}. Keep the homogeneous constant until imposing the initial condition.

Solution to 1

Multiplication by e2te^{2t} gives

ddt(e2ty)=et.\frac{d}{dt}(e^{2t}y)=e^t.

Hence e2ty=et+Ce^{2t}y=e^t+C, so y=e−t+Ce−2ty=e^{-t}+Ce^{-2t}. The initial value gives C=−1C=-1:

y(t)=e−t−e−2t.y(t)=e^{-t}-e^{-2t}.

Then y′=−e−t+2e−2ty'=-e^{-t}+2e^{-2t} and y′+2y=e−ty'+2y=e^{-t}, which checks both the forcing and the homogeneous decay.

Hints for 2

Initial data determine the two integration constants locally. Boundary data at separated points instead impose a compatibility condition on those constants and, sometimes, on the parameter ω\omega.

Solution to 2

For fixed ω>0\omega\gt0,

y=Acos⁡(ωx)+Bsin⁡(ωx).y=A\cos(\omega x)+B\sin(\omega x).

y(0)y(0) and y′(0)y'(0) determine AA and BB directly, so this is an initial-value problem. The boundary condition y(0)=0y(0)=0 gives A=0A=0; then y(L)=Bsin⁡(ωL)=0y(L)=B\sin(\omega L)=0. A nonzero BB exists only if

ωL=nπ,n=1,2,….\omega L=n\pi, \qquad n=1,2,\ldots.

The boundary problem has selected a discrete spectrum. Treating two-point boundary data as if they were ordinary initial data misses this compatibility condition.

Hints for 3

The smallest power of xx comes from the n=0n=0 terms. Set its coefficient to zero before deriving any recurrence.

Solution to 3

For the leading term a0xsa_0x^s,

x2y′′+xy′−ν2y=a0[s(s−1)+s−ν2]xs+⋯ .x^2y''+xy'-\nu^2y =a_0\bigl[s(s-1)+s-\nu^2\bigr]x^s+\cdots.

Therefore the indicial equation is s2−ν2=0s^2-\nu^2=0, with exponents

s=±ν.s=\pm\nu.

The result identifies the two local scalings. When their difference is an integer, the second independent solution may contain a logarithm; the indicial roots alone do not settle that question.

Hints for 4

Find the zeros of f(z)=λz−z3f(z)=\lambda z-z^3. The linearized perturbation obeys η˙=f′(z∗)η\dot\eta=f'(z_*)\eta.

Solution to 4

For λ>0\lambda\gt0, the equilibria are z∗=0z_*=0 and z∗=±λz_*=\pm\sqrt\lambda. Since f′(z)=λ−3z2f'(z)=\lambda-3z^2,

f′(0)=λ>0,f′(±λ)=−2λ<0.f'(0)=\lambda\gt0, \qquad f'(\pm\sqrt\lambda)=-2\lambda\lt0.

Thus z=0z=0 is linearly unstable and the two nonzero equilibria are linearly stable. The sign follows from η(t)∼ef′(z∗)t\eta(t)\sim e^{f'(z_*)t}; it is not determined by the sign of z∗z_*.

  • Secure: you distinguish initial, boundary, spectral, singular-point, and stability questions; all four solutions include a direct check.
  • Uncertain: the equation class is identified but one method needs prompting. Review that method, change a coefficient or datum, and solve again.
  • Not yet: data are imposed without counting integration constants, a boundary spectrum is treated as an arbitrary parameter, or linear stability is inferred without linearization. Complete the focused review before returning to a route that uses geodesics or separated perturbations.

For y′+p(t)y=q(t)y'+p(t)y=q(t), an integrating factor converts the left side into one derivative. For a system X˙=A(t)X+b(t)\dot X=A(t)X+b(t), existence and uniqueness are local statements tied to regularity of the coefficients. When AA is constant, eigenvalues organize modes, but defective matrices require generalized eigenvectors.

An nnth-order equation generally needs nn independent conditions, but their location matters. Initial data at one regular point define evolution. Conditions at separate endpoints define a boundary-value problem and can fail to have a solution, have several solutions, or select eigenvalues. State the interval and endpoint behavior before choosing a solver.

Near a regular singular point, a Frobenius expansion exposes allowed local powers. At an irregular singular point, exponential or asymptotic scales may replace a convergent power series. An asymptotic series must state its limit and error ordering; it is not automatically convergent.

Linearization classifies perturbations only when the linear term is decisive. Zero eigenvalues require higher-order or center-manifold analysis. In perturbation theory, substitute the approximation back into the original equation and state the residual order. These distinctions recur in Affine and Variational Geodesics and in separated black-hole wave equations.

A component of the separation between nearby freely falling trajectories obeys the constant-curvature model

d2Xdτ2+κX=0,X(0)=X0,X′(0)=0.\frac{d^2X}{d\tau^2}+\kappa X=0, \qquad X(0)=X_0, \qquad X'(0)=0.

Solve for κ>0\kappa\gt0, κ=0\kappa=0, and κ<0\kappa\lt0. State what the first zero or the late-time behavior says, and identify one limitation of this model.

Hint 1

Treat the three signs separately. For κ<0\kappa\lt0, write κ=−α2\kappa=-\alpha^2 with α>0\alpha\gt0.

Hint 2

Use both initial conditions. Check dimensions: ∣κ∣ τ\sqrt{|\kappa|}\,\tau must be dimensionless.

Solution

For κ>0\kappa\gt0,

X(τ)=X0cos⁡(κ τ),X(\tau)=X_0\cos(\sqrt\kappa\,\tau),

with first zero at τ=π/(2κ)\tau=\pi/(2\sqrt\kappa). In the one-component model this represents focusing of that separation direction. For κ=0\kappa=0, X=X0X=X_0 because the initial relative velocity vanishes. For κ=−α2<0\kappa=-\alpha^2\lt0,

X(τ)=X0cosh⁡(ατ),X(\tau)=X_0\cosh(\alpha\tau),

so the separation grows exponentially at late time. Direct differentiation verifies every case. In an actual spacetime, the tidal matrix can vary with τ\tau, couple components, and depend on the chosen geodesic; a single constant κ\kappa does not establish global focusing or instability.

  • Solving the homogeneous equation and forgetting the forcing term.
  • Counting boundary conditions without checking their independence or compatibility.
  • Calling every singular coefficient a physical singularity rather than examining the equation and chosen variable.
  • Reporting a numerical curve without a residual, convergence check, or preserved invariant.

After the transfer task, return to whichever route sent you here: Graduate General Relativity Self-Study, Compact Binaries and Gravitational Waves, Computational Relativity Self-Study, the First Graduate General Relativity course, or Gravitational Radiation and Compact Binaries. If your difficulty is specifically with wave propagation or causal Green functions, continue first to PDEs and Green Functions for Gravitation.