Mechanics and Special Relativity Diagnostic
Scrollable formula. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal hidden content.
Scrollable table. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal additional columns.
Scrollable figure. Use Left and Right arrow keys to inspect hidden content.
General relativity assumes that several earlier ideas are already usable together: stationary action and conservation in mechanics, invariant intervals and four-vectors in special relativity, and observer-based measurement. This diagnostic separates those capabilities so that one weak area does not force a review of all three. It supplies a concise review and then returns you to the GR route that sent you here.
You should leave able to formulate a mechanical problem variationally, reason with Minkowski causal geometry and energy–momentum, and distinguish coordinate components from quantities measured by a specified observer.
Mechanics and special-relativity diagnostic
Section titled “Mechanics and special-relativity diagnostic”- A particle moves in a central potential with Identify the conserved angular momentum and derive the radial equation in terms of it.
- In units , events differ by . Classify the separation, find the proper time between the events, and give the speed of the inertial frame in which they occur at the same place.
- A particle has four-momentum and an observer has four-velocity with . Compute the observer’s measured energy and check that it is positive.
- The worldline describes hyperbolic motion. Verify that is proper time and that the four-acceleration has constant magnitude .
Hints and solutions
Section titled “Hints and solutions”Hints for 1
is cyclic. Use its conjugate momentum to eliminate from the Euler–Lagrange equation for .
Solution to 1
Since has no explicit dependence,
is constant. The radial Euler–Lagrange equation is
Equivalently for . The limit removes the centrifugal term, and every term has force dimension.
Hints for 2
With the site signature, compute . A timelike displacement has a rest frame with boost speed .
Solution to 2
The interval is
so the separation is timelike and the elapsed proper time is . The boost gives . Since , this is a valid inertial frame.
Hints for 3
First find . Remember the negative time component in the scalar product.
Solution to 3
For , . Therefore
Both and are future-directed timelike vectors, so positivity was expected. The number is a scalar for the specified observer, although another observer measures another scalar.
Hints for 4
Differentiate once to obtain and twice to obtain . Check , , and .
Solution to 4
Differentiation gives
Thus
so is proper time. Also and
The proper-acceleration magnitude is constant even though the coordinate acceleration is not.
Interpret the result
Section titled “Interpret the result”Use each prompt to check a different skill.
- Secure: the corresponding solution is set up invariantly and includes its limit or norm check.
- Uncertain: the right object is chosen but a sign, projection, or conservation argument needs a hint. Review only that capability and retry with changed data.
- Not yet: a cyclic coordinate is not connected to conservation, timelike and spacelike separations are confused, or measured energy is read directly from a coordinate component without naming an observer.
Question 1 samples mechanics; question 2 samples special-relativistic causal geometry; questions 3–4 sample observer measurement and four-vector kinematics. A weakness in one category does not imply a weakness in the others.
Focused review
Section titled “Focused review”Mechanics and variational reasoning
Section titled “Mechanics and variational reasoning”An action with fixed endpoints yields the Euler–Lagrange equations. A continuous symmetry gives a conserved quantity; a cyclic coordinate is the simplest case. Review the derivation and its boundary assumptions at Variational Mechanics and Symmetries. Effective potentials reorganize radial motion but do not add a new force.
Special-relativistic geometry
Section titled “Special-relativistic geometry”The invariant interval, not coordinate time alone, determines causal class. With , timelike vectors have negative squared norm and future-directed four-velocities satisfy . Review Events, Intervals, and Minkowski Geometry and verify every boost by preserving the interval.
Observers and measured components
Section titled “Observers and measured components”At an event, an observer is a future-directed unit timelike vector . The measured energy of momentum is , while the spatial momentum is its projection orthogonal to . Coordinate components become readings only after a frame is specified. Observers, Rest Spaces, and Measured Components develops this construction.
Transfer task: the free relativistic particle
Section titled “Transfer task: the free relativistic particle”For one-dimensional motion in an inertial frame, take
Derive the canonical momentum , the Hamiltonian , and the identity relating , , and . Then recover the Newtonian kinetic term from the small- expansion.
Hint 1
Differentiate with respect to . Use .
Hint 2
After finding , eliminate using and .
Solution
The momentum is
The Legendre transform gives
Consequently
This is the mass-shell relation for energy and spatial momentum . For ,
The rest energy is the constant ; the first velocity-dependent term is the Newtonian kinetic energy. The Lagrangian itself expands as , and the additive constant does not affect the equations of motion.
Common errors
Section titled “Common errors”- Calling stationary action “minimum action” without checking the second variation.
- Mixing the site’s norm with formulas copied from the opposite signature.
- Treating coordinate velocity, four-velocity, and proper acceleration as the same derivative.
- Saying energy is “not a scalar”: is a scalar once the observer is specified.
Return to your route
Section titled “Return to your route”After reviewing only the topics you need and completing the transfer task, return to the Graduate General Relativity Self-Study Path or the First Graduate Course in General Relativity.