Horizon Absorption at Finite Amplitude
Scrollable formula. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal hidden content.
Scrollable table. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal additional columns.
Scrollable figure. Use Left and Right arrow keys to inspect hidden content.
At finite amplitude, absorption by a black hole is best measured as a quasi-local change of horizon geometry, not as a perturbative correction assigned to a coordinate worldline. On a dynamical horizon, exact balance laws relate area growth, matter flux, shear, and angular-momentum transfer. Their perturbative tidal-heating limit is a check; it is not the definition used during a close nonlinear encounter.
Helpful background. Black-Hole Geometry and Mechanics supplies horizon mechanics; Black-Hole Perturbation Theory supplies weak-field absorption; Formulations of General Relativity supplies hypersurface geometry; Relativistic Two-Body Dynamics supplies encounter kinematics; Computational Relativity supplies horizon diagnostics.
Exact area balance
Section titled “Exact area balance”Let be a smooth spacelike dynamical horizon with spherical leaves satisfying and , in four-dimensional general relativity with . Let be its future unit timelike normal and its unit tangent normal to the leaves, pointing toward increasing area. Fix the outgoing normalization by ; choose , so . The inner product alone would leave a boost freedom and would not fix the coefficients in the flux law. Let
define the area radius. With the lapse on , the balance between leaves and has the form
Here is the derivative intrinsic to , , and the shear is the trace-free part of the projected . With leaf projector , the second term uses . The gravitational integrand is nonnegative. For matter obeying the dominant energy condition, the matter term is also nonnegative, so . The assumptions on topology and matter: they are what reduce the integrated intrinsic-curvature term to the displayed .
The precise derivation, normalization, and vacuum gravitational flux are given in Ashtekar and Krishnan 2004, §3.2, Eqs. (13)–(25), and §3.3, Eq. (26), pp. 16–24. Rescaling and changes intermediate quantities; the balance law is used with its declared foliation and normalization.
Spin and energy exchange
Section titled “Spin and energy exchange”For an axial vector field tangent to a leaf, define quasi-local angular momentum using the horizon connection or, in a spatial slice, its extrinsic curvature. If the slice convention is
then one standard expression is
with the outward unit normal to within the slice. Reversing the sign convention for reverses the displayed prefactor. Approximate axial symmetry requires stating how is selected.
The change in equals matter and gravitational angular-momentum flux through the horizon. Combining and with a Kerr-inspired quasi-local mass,
provides a nonlinear energy diagnostic for an uncharged near-axisymmetric horizon. The angular-momentum and energy balance laws are developed in Ashtekar and Krishnan 2004, §4.2.1, Eqs. (42)–(46), and §4.2.2, Eqs. (47)–(50), pp. 31–36.
From tidal heating to strong absorption
Section titled “From tidal heating to strong absorption”In the slow, weak-field limit, horizon shear is driven linearly by the external Weyl curvature, so the area flux is quadratic in the tidal field. This reproduces perturbative tidal heating and torque. During a close encounter, however, the response can be nonadiabatic and the horizon can change slicing, develop large multipoles, or join a common horizon. The exact balance law remains meaningful on a smooth spacelike dynamical-horizon segment even when a low-order absorption expansion fails.
For a numerical measurement:
- locate and track all relevant marginal surfaces rather than only the outermost one;
- compute area and angular momentum with one orientation and extrinsic-curvature convention;
- integrate matter, shear, and connection flux over the same horizon tube;
- compare , , and with asymptotic losses;
- report errors from horizon finding, approximate symmetry, slicing, and temporal integration.
A jump between different outermost marginal surfaces is not a burst of physical flux through one smooth tube. Branch identification must precede budget interpretation.
Independent checks and limitations
Section titled “Independent checks and limitations”A nontrivial spacelike dynamical-horizon segment cannot have identically vanishing vacuum gravitational flux: the displayed law would give constant area, contradicting its increasing area radius. An isolated horizon is a null zero-flux limit and requires the corresponding null-horizon formulation. Every term has dimensions of length divided by in units. At weak amplitude, the flux is second order in the first-order shear. The balance law does not turn an apparent horizon into the event horizon, and it does not define a unique quasi-local spin without a specified axial field.
Check the area law
Section titled “Check the area law”On a vacuum dynamical-horizon segment, suppose and the integral of is in length units. What is ?
Solution
The balance law gives
so . The positive result independently checks the shear-flux sign.
References
Section titled “References”- Ashtekar, Abhay, and Badri Krishnan, “Isolated and Dynamical Horizons and Their Applications”, Living Reviews in Relativity 7, 10, 2004. Open PDF.
Further reading
Section titled “Further reading”- Poisson, Eric, “Absorption of Mass and Angular Momentum by a Black Hole: Time-Domain Formalisms for Gravitational Perturbations, and the Small-Hole/Slow-Motion Approximation”, Physical Review D 70, 084044, 2004. Open PDF.
- Vega, Ian, Eric Poisson, and Ryan Massey, “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Geometries of a Tidally Deformed Black Hole”, Classical and Quantum Gravity 28, 175006, 2011. Open PDF.