Skip to content

Scrollable formula. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal hidden content.

Scrollable table. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal additional columns.

Scrollable figure. Use Left and Right arrow keys to inspect hidden content.

At finite amplitude, absorption by a black hole is best measured as a quasi-local change of horizon geometry, not as a perturbative correction assigned to a coordinate worldline. On a dynamical horizon, exact balance laws relate area growth, matter flux, shear, and angular-momentum transfer. Their perturbative tidal-heating limit is a check; it is not the definition used during a close nonlinear encounter.

Helpful background. Black-Hole Geometry and Mechanics supplies horizon mechanics; Black-Hole Perturbation Theory supplies weak-field absorption; Formulations of General Relativity supplies hypersurface geometry; Relativistic Two-Body Dynamics supplies encounter kinematics; Computational Relativity supplies horizon diagnostics.

Let H\mathcal H be a smooth spacelike dynamical horizon with spherical leaves SS satisfying θ(ℓ)=0\theta_{(\ell)}=0 and θ(n)<0\theta_{(n)}\lt0, in four-dimensional general relativity with Λ=0\Lambda=0. Let τ^a\widehat\tau^a be its future unit timelike normal and r^a\widehat r^a its unit tangent normal to the leaves, pointing toward increasing area. Fix the outgoing normalization by ℓa=τ^a+r^a\ell^a=\widehat\tau^a+\widehat r^a; choose na=(τ^a−r^a)/2n^a=(\widehat\tau^a-\widehat r^a)/2, so ℓ⋅n=−1\ell\mathbin{\cdot}n=-1. The inner product alone would leave a boost freedom and would not fix the coefficients in the flux law. Let

A=4πR2A=4\pi R^2

define the area radius. With the lapse NR=∣DR∣N_R=|D R| on H\mathcal H, the balance between leaves S1S_1 and S2S_2 has the form

R2−R12G=∫ΔHTab τ^aξ(R)b d3V+116πG∫ΔHNR(∣σ(ℓ)∣2+2∣ζ∣2)d3V.\frac{R_2-R_1}{2G} =\int_{\Delta\mathcal H} T_{ab}\,\widehat\tau^a\xi_{(R)}^b\,d^3V +\frac{1}{16\pi G} \int_{\Delta\mathcal H} N_R\left( |\sigma^{(\ell)}|^2+2|\zeta|^2 \right)d^3V.

Here DD is the derivative intrinsic to H\mathcal H, ξ(R)a=NRℓa\xi_{(R)}^a=N_R\ell^a, and the shear is the trace-free part of the projected ∇aℓb\nabla_a\ell_b. With leaf projector q~ab\widetilde q_a{}^b, the second term uses ζa=q~abr^c∇cℓb\zeta_a=\widetilde q_a{}^b\widehat r^c\nabla_c\ell_b. The gravitational integrand is nonnegative. For matter obeying the dominant energy condition, the matter term is also nonnegative, so R2≥R1R_2\ge R_1. The assumptions on topology and Λ\Lambda matter: they are what reduce the integrated intrinsic-curvature term to the displayed R/(2G)R/(2G).

The precise derivation, normalization, and vacuum gravitational flux are given in Ashtekar and Krishnan 2004, §3.2, Eqs. (13)–(25), and §3.3, Eq. (26), pp. 16–24. Rescaling ℓ\ell and nn changes intermediate quantities; the balance law is used with its declared foliation and normalization.

For an axial vector field φa\varphi^a tangent to a leaf, define quasi-local angular momentum using the horizon connection or, in a spatial slice, its extrinsic curvature. If the slice convention is

Kab=−hachbd∇cτ^d,K_{ab}=-h_a{}^c h_b{}^d\nabla_c\widehat\tau_d,

then one standard expression is

JS[φ]=18πG∮SKabφar^b d2V,J_S[\varphi] =\frac{1}{8\pi G}\oint_S K_{ab}\varphi^a\widehat r^b\,d^2V,

with r^a\widehat r^a the outward unit normal to SS within the slice. Reversing the sign convention for KabK_{ab} reverses the displayed prefactor. Approximate axial symmetry requires stating how φa\varphi^a is selected.

The change in JSJ_S equals matter and gravitational angular-momentum flux through the horizon. Combining AA and JJ with a Kerr-inspired quasi-local mass,

MH2=A16πG2+4πJH2A,M_H^2 =\frac{A}{16\pi G^2} +\frac{4\pi J_H^2}{A},

provides a nonlinear energy diagnostic for an uncharged near-axisymmetric horizon. The angular-momentum and energy balance laws are developed in Ashtekar and Krishnan 2004, §4.2.1, Eqs. (42)–(46), and §4.2.2, Eqs. (47)–(50), pp. 31–36.

In the slow, weak-field limit, horizon shear is driven linearly by the external Weyl curvature, so the area flux is quadratic in the tidal field. This reproduces perturbative tidal heating and torque. During a close encounter, however, the response can be nonadiabatic and the horizon can change slicing, develop large multipoles, or join a common horizon. The exact balance law remains meaningful on a smooth spacelike dynamical-horizon segment even when a low-order absorption expansion fails.

For a numerical measurement:

  • locate and track all relevant marginal surfaces rather than only the outermost one;
  • compute area and angular momentum with one orientation and extrinsic-curvature convention;
  • integrate matter, shear, and connection flux over the same horizon tube;
  • compare ΔA\Delta A, ΔJ\Delta J, and ΔMH\Delta M_H with asymptotic losses;
  • report errors from horizon finding, approximate symmetry, slicing, and temporal integration.

A jump between different outermost marginal surfaces is not a burst of physical flux through one smooth tube. Branch identification must precede budget interpretation.

A nontrivial spacelike dynamical-horizon segment cannot have identically vanishing vacuum gravitational flux: the displayed law would give constant area, contradicting its increasing area radius. An isolated horizon is a null zero-flux limit and requires the corresponding null-horizon formulation. Every term has dimensions of length divided by GG in c=1c=1 units. At weak amplitude, the flux is second order in the first-order shear. The balance law does not turn an apparent horizon into the event horizon, and it does not define a unique quasi-local spin without a specified axial field.

On a vacuum dynamical-horizon segment, suppose ζ=0\zeta=0 and the integral of NR∣σ(ℓ)∣2N_R|\sigma^{(\ell)}|^2 is 8πL8\pi L in length units. What is R2−R1R_2-R_1?

Solution

The balance law gives

R2−R12G=8πL16πG=L2G,\frac{R_2-R_1}{2G} =\frac{8\pi L}{16\pi G} =\frac{L}{2G},

so R2−R1=LR_2-R_1=L. The positive result independently checks the shear-flux sign.