Skip to content

Schwarzschild-Tangherlini Spacetimes

Scrollable formula. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal hidden content.

Scrollable table. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal additional columns.

Scrollable figure. Use Left and Right arrow keys to inspect hidden content.

The Schwarzschild–Tangherlini solution is the unique local spherically symmetric vacuum geometry in D≥4D\ge4 under the usual nondegeneracy assumptions. Its potential falls as r−(D−3)r^{-(D-3)}, so the horizon radius scales as M1/(D−3)M^{1/(D-3)} rather than linearly with mass. Keeping the unit-sphere area and GDG_D explicit fixes the conversion between the metric length parameter and ADM mass.

Required background. The Einstein Equation supplies the DD-dimensional vacuum field equation.

Helpful background. The Riemann Curvature Tensor supplies the curvature check; Exact Solutions of Einstein’s Equations places the family; Global Structure develops horizon extensions; and Killing Fields and Isometry Groups supplies static spherical symmetry.

The higher-dimensional spherical vacuum metric

Section titled “The higher-dimensional spherical vacuum metric”

Let dΩD−22d\Omega_{D-2}^2 be the unit round metric and take areal radius rr. A static ansatz can be written

ds2=−f(r)dt2+dr2f(r)+r2dΩD−22.ds^2=-f(r)dt^2+\frac{dr^2}{f(r)}+r^2d\Omega_{D-2}^2.

For Rab=0R_{ab}=0, a radial Einstein equation reduces to

ddr[rD−3(1−f)]=0.\frac{d}{dr}\left[r^{D-3}(1-f)\right]=0.

Hence

f(r)=1−μrD−3=1−(r0r)D−3,r0D−3=μ.f(r)=1-\frac{\mu}{r^{D-3}} =1-\left(\frac{r_0}{r}\right)^{D-3}, \qquad r_0^{D-3}=\mu.

The remaining independent field equation is then satisfied, providing a useful check of the reduction. Tangherlini first gave this higher-dimensional vacuum solution and its charged analogue in Tangherlini 1963, pp. 636–651.

The unit-sphere area

ΩD−2=2π(D−1)/2Γ((D−1)/2)\Omega_{D-2}=\frac{2\pi^{(D-1)/2}}{\Gamma((D-1)/2)}

enters the ADM normalization:

μ=16πGDM(D−2)ΩD−2.\mu=\frac{16\pi G_D M}{(D-2)\Omega_{D-2}}.

This follows either from the higher-dimensional ADM integral or by matching

gtt=−(1+2Φ+⋯ ),Φ=−8πGDM(D−2)ΩD−2rD−3g_{tt}=-(1+2\Phi+\cdots), \qquad \Phi=-\frac{8\pi G_DM}{(D-2)\Omega_{D-2}r^{D-3}}

to the weak-field Gauss law. Calling μ\mu the mass without this factor obscures dimension and convention dependence.

For M>0M>0, ff has a simple positive root at r=r0r=r_0. The static chart covers r>r0r>r_0. An ingoing coordinate

v=t+∫drf(r)v=t+\int\frac{dr}{f(r)}

changes the radial-time sector to −f dv2+2 dv dr-f\,dv^2+2\,dv\,dr, which is regular at the simple root. The horizon has topology SD−2S^{D-2} and area

AH=ΩD−2r0D−2.\mathcal A_H=\Omega_{D-2}r_0^{D-2}.

With the asymptotic normalization of tt, its surface gravity is

κ=12f′(r0)=D−32r0.\kappa=\frac12f'(r_0)=\frac{D-3}{2r_0}.

The horizon is not a curvature singularity. In vacuum the Ricci tensor vanishes, while

RabcdRabcd=(D−1)(D−2)2(D−3)μ2r2(D−1).R_{abcd}R^{abcd} =(D-1)(D-2)^2(D-3) \frac{\mu^2}{r^{2(D-1)}}.

This is finite at r=r0r=r_0 and diverges at r=0r=0. For D=4D=4, μ=2G4M\mu=2G_4M and the expression becomes 48G42M2/r648G_4^2M^2/r^6, recovering Schwarzschild exactly.

Solving the mass relation for the horizon radius gives

r0=[16πGDM(D−2)ΩD−2]1/(D−3).r_0=\left[ \frac{16\pi G_DM}{(D-2)\Omega_{D-2}} \right]^{1/(D-3)}.

Thus a fixed multiplicative change in MM produces a smaller fractional change in r0r_0 as DD increases. The far-field curvature also decays more rapidly: the Kretschmann scalar falls as r−2(D−1)r^{-2(D-1)}. Neither statement means gravity is uniformly “weaker” in higher dimensions, because GDG_D has dimension LD−2L^{D-2} and comparisons require a fixed physical scale.

The construction fails at D=3D=3: the exponent D−3D-3 vanishes and the asymptotically flat Newtonian Green function is logarithmic. Three-dimensional black holes instead require, for example, the negative cosmological constant and quotient structure of BTZ. At D=2D=2, Einstein’s tensor vanishes identically. These lower-dimensional cases are not obtained by naively substituting DD into the Tangherlini formula.

For M<0M<0, ff has no positive horizon and r=0r=0 is naked. The exact metric still solves vacuum Einstein equations away from the origin, but it is not a regular black hole. This distinction between an exact local solution and an admissible black-hole domain applies across all dimensions.

The same solution also supplies a clean dimensional Smarr check. Using the asymptotic time normalization, define T=κ/(2π)T=\kappa/(2\pi) and S=AH/(4GD)S=\mathcal A_H/(4G_D). The formulas above give

TS=D−3D−2M,TS=\frac{D-3}{D-2}M,

or (D−3)M=(D−2)TS(D-3)M=(D-2)TS. This follows from the different scaling weights of mass and area and independently tests the factors of D−2D-2, ΩD−2\Omega_{D-2}, and GDG_D. It is recorded here as a geometric consistency relation; thermodynamic interpretation and the first law are developed with the necessary mechanics elsewhere.

For the charged Tangherlini analogue, the radial function contains two mass- and charge-dependent inverse powers and can have inner and outer horizons. Its normalization depends on the Maxwell action convention. One should therefore not obtain it by replacing 2M/r2M/r with a guessed higher-dimensional expression; derive the charge coefficient from the stated Einstein–Maxwell equations and a flux integral.

Dropping ΩD−2\Omega_{D-2}. The metric parameter has dimension LD−3L^{D-3}; the physical ADM mass includes both GDG_D and the unit-sphere area.

Treating DD as a continuous substitution at special dimensions. The solution assumes D≥4D\ge4. The field equations and Green functions change qualitatively at D=3D=3 and D=2D=2.

Use the mass–radius relation to express the horizon area as a power of MM.

Solution

Substitute the expression for r0r_0 into AH=ΩD−2r0D−2\mathcal A_H=\Omega_{D-2}r_0^{D-2}:

AH=ΩD−2[16πGDM(D−2)ΩD−2]D−2D−3.\mathcal A_H =\Omega_{D-2} \left[ \frac{16\pi G_DM}{(D-2)\Omega_{D-2}} \right]^{\frac{D-2}{D-3}}.

Hence AH∝M(D−2)/(D−3)\mathcal A_H\propto M^{(D-2)/(D-3)}. For D=4D=4 the exponent is 22; for D=5D=5 it is 3/23/2.

  • Frank R. Tangherlini, “Schwarzschild Field in nn Dimensions and the Dimensionality of Space Problem,” Il Nuovo Cimento 27, 636–651 (1963). DOI.