Skip to content

Einstein Gravity in Tetrad Variables

Scrollable formula. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal hidden content.

Scrollable table. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal additional columns.

Scrollable figure. Use Left and Right arrow keys to inspect hidden content.

A tetrad replaces the metric by an orthonormal coframe and exposes a local Lorentz gauge symmetry. This is more than a change of notation: spinors couple naturally to the coframe and spin connection, while orientation, invertibility, and boundary data become independent assumptions that must be stated before the tetrad and metric descriptions can be called equivalent.

Required background. Frames, Coframes, and Anholonomy supplies coframes and local Lorentz freedom, The Gibbons-Hawking-York Boundary Term supplies the metric variational problem, and Presymplectic Potentials and Currents supplies the action-to-phase-space boundary decomposition.

Helpful background. The Einstein Equation supplies the metric field equation, Hypersurface Normals and Tangential Projectors supplies boundary and slicing geometry, and Formulations of General Relativity places tetrads among equivalent classical formulations.

Let eI=eIμdxμe^I=e^I{}_{\mu}dx^\mu be a smooth, invertible coframe on an oriented, time-oriented four-dimensional spacetime. Internal indices are raised with

ηIJ=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1),\eta_{IJ}=\operatorname{diag}(-1,1,1,1),

and the spacetime metric is

gμν=ηIJeIμeJν.g_{\mu\nu}=\eta_{IJ}e^I{}_{\mu}e^J{}_{\nu}.

Fix the internal symbol by ϵ0123=+1\epsilon_{0123}=+1 and select coframes whose orientation agrees with the spacetime orientation. The volume form is then

ϵ=14!ϵIJKLeI∧eJ∧eK∧eL.\boldsymbol\epsilon =\frac1{4!}\epsilon_{IJKL} e^I\wedge e^J\wedge e^K\wedge e^L.

A proper, orthochronous local Lorentz transformation acts as

eI⟼e′I=ΛIJ(x)eJ,ΛTηΛ=η,e^I\longmapsto e'^I=\Lambda^I{}_J(x)e^J, \qquad \Lambda^T\eta\Lambda=\eta,

and leaves both gμνg_{\mu\nu} and the chosen orientation unchanged. Thus the six Lorentz components of the sixteen coframe components are gauge. Improper or time-reversing transformations are not silently included in this gauge group, because they can change the selected orientation or time orientation.

A Lorentz connection satisfies ωIJ=−ωJI\omega^{IJ}=-\omega^{JI} and has curvature

FIJ=dωIJ+ωIK∧ωKJ.F^{IJ}=d\omega^{IJ}+\omega^I{}_K\wedge\omega^{KJ}.

On this page ω=ω(e)\omega=\omega(e) is the unique torsion-free connection compatible with an invertible coframe. Its curvature encodes the Riemann tensor through

FIJ=12RIJKL eK∧eL.F^{IJ}=\frac12R^{IJ}{}_{KL}\,e^K\wedge e^L.

The local Lorentz transformation of the connection is inhomogeneous,

ω′=ΛωΛ−1−dΛ Λ−1,\omega' =\Lambda\omega\Lambda^{-1}-d\Lambda\,\Lambda^{-1},

so that F′=ΛFΛ−1F'=\Lambda F\Lambda^{-1}. A position-dependent rotation of a coframe therefore cannot be made while leaving the spin connection fixed.

Write κ=8πG\kappa=8\pi G. With the stated orientation and curvature convention, the second-order tetrad action is

S[e]=14κ∫MϵIJKLeI∧eJ∧(FKL[ω(e)]−Λ6eK∧eL)+S∂M.S[e] =\frac1{4\kappa}\int_{\mathcal M} \epsilon_{IJKL} e^I\wedge e^J\wedge \left(F^{KL}[\omega(e)] -\frac{\Lambda}{6}e^K\wedge e^L\right) +S_{\partial\mathcal M}.

For an invertible coframe, its bulk integrand equals −g((4)R−2Λ)d4x/(2κ)\sqrt{-g}({}^{(4)}R-2\Lambda)d^4x/(2\kappa). The surface functional S∂MS_{\partial\mathcal M} is fixed by the boundary data; replacing the metric by a tetrad does not remove the need for a well-posed variational principle.

Varying the coframe gives the Einstein three-form equation

ϵIJKLeJ∧(FKL−Λ3eK∧eL)=0.\epsilon_{IJKL}e^J\wedge \left(F^{KL}-\frac{\Lambda}{3}e^K\wedge e^L\right)=0.

Multiplication by the inverse tetrad converts this equation into Gμν+Λgμν=0G_{\mu\nu}+\Lambda g_{\mu\nu}=0. Six combinations are Lorentz Noether identities, leaving the ten independent metric equations. The action and its first-order extension are developed with explicit boundary variations in Corichi, Rubalcava-García, and Vukašinac 2016, §IV.A, pp. 22–24, PDF.

The equivalence just used has a domain: eIμe^I{}_{\mu} must be invertible and orientation-compatible, the connection must be the torsion-free compatible one, and the boundary and matter couplings must be translated consistently. Degenerate coframes do not define an inverse metric and can introduce additional solution branches in a first-order theory.

For Cartesian Minkowski space,

e0=dt,e1=dx,e2=dy,e3=dz,e^0=dt, \qquad e^1=dx, \qquad e^2=dy, \qquad e^3=dz,

the compatible connection and curvature vanish. With Λ=0\Lambda=0, the tetrad field equation is therefore satisfied. A local Lorentz transformation can make de′Ide'^I nonzero without changing the metric; the transformed connection then cancels that anholonomy and keeps the curvature zero.

Treating the tetrad as unique. Metrics determine Lorentz-gauge orbits of coframes, not a preferred coframe.

Ignoring orientation and degeneracy. The epsilon action distinguishes an orientation, and its metric equivalence uses the inverse tetrad at a decisive step.

Exercise: a local boost of the Minkowski coframe

Section titled “Exercise: a local boost of the Minkowski coframe”

Let Λ(x)\Lambda(x) be a boost of rapidity χ(x)\chi(x) in the internal 00–11 plane. Starting from the Cartesian coframe and ω=0\omega=0, find the connection after the boost and verify that torsion and curvature remain zero.

Solution

The transformed fields are

e′=Λe,ω′=−dΛ Λ−1.e'=\Lambda e, \qquad \omega'=-d\Lambda\,\Lambda^{-1}.

Using de=0d e=0,

T′=de′+ω′∧e′=dΛ∧e−dΛ Λ−1∧Λe=0.\begin{aligned} T'&=de'+\omega'\wedge e'\\ &=d\Lambda\wedge e -d\Lambda\,\Lambda^{-1}\wedge\Lambda e=0. \end{aligned}

The connection is pure gauge, so the Maurer–Cartan identity gives

F′=dω′+ω′∧ω′=0.F'=d\omega'+\omega'\wedge\omega'=0.

For the boost generator J01J_{01} one may write ω′=−(dχ)J01\omega'=-(d\chi)J_{01}. The exercise shows why setting the connection to zero in every tetrad gauge would incorrectly create torsion.

  • Corichi, Alejandro, Irais Rubalcava-García, and Tatjana Vukašinac. “Actions, Topological Terms and Boundaries in First Order Gravity: A Review.” International Journal of Modern Physics D 25, no. 4 (2016): 1630011. DOI. Open PDF.