Skip to content

Thermodynamics, Sound Speed, and Causality

Scrollable formula. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal hidden content.

Scrollable table. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal additional columns.

Scrollable figure. Use Left and Right arrow keys to inspect hidden content.

The pressure of a relativistic fluid is not an independently adjustable force: it is a derivative of an energy function with specified entropy and composition. That thermodynamic structure determines the characteristic sound cone. Linearizing the Euler equations in a local rest frame shows that the adiabatic derivative cs2=(∂p/∂ε)s,Yic_s^2=(\partial p/\partial\varepsilon)_{s,Y_i} is both the squared sound speed and the coefficient controlling local hyperbolicity. Stability requires it to be nonnegative, while relativistic causality requires it not to exceed unity.

Required background. Hilbert Stress–Energy from Metric Variation supplies stress–energy conservation; Events, Intervals, and Minkowski Geometry supplies local inertial frames and causal cones; and Differential Equations supplies linearization and hyperbolicity.

Helpful background. The Einstein Equation fixes the gravitational coupling; Relativistic Matter and Compact Objects gives the volume-level setting; and Computational Relativity uses these characteristic speeds in evolution schemes.

Let n>0n\gt0 be baryon number density, ss entropy per baryon, and YiY_i independent composition fractions. Assume positive enthalpy density w=ε+pw=\varepsilon+p. A convenient fundamental relation is ε=ε(n,s,Yi)\varepsilon=\varepsilon(n,s,Y_i). For fixed composition, the local first law reads

d ⁣(εn)=Tds−pd ⁣(1n),d\!\left(\frac{\varepsilon}{n}\right) =T ds-p d\!\left(\frac1n\right),

or, equivalently,

dε=ε+pndn+nTds.d\varepsilon=\frac{\varepsilon+p}{n}dn+nT ds.

Here w=ε+pw=\varepsilon+p is enthalpy density and h=w/nh=w/n is enthalpy per baryon. At fixed entropy per baryon,

p=n(∂ε∂n)s−ε.p=n\left(\frac{\partial\varepsilon}{\partial n}\right)_s-\varepsilon.

This identity is a stringent consistency check for an equation-of-state table: interpolating pp and ε\varepsilon independently can violate it even when both columns look smooth. With composition, add n∑iAi dYin\sum_i\mathcal A_i\,dY_i, where Ai=(∂(ε/n)/∂Yi)n,s,Yj≠i\mathcal A_i=(\partial(\varepsilon/n)/\partial Y_i)_{n,s,Y_{j\ne i}} is the chemical potential combination conjugate to the independent fraction YiY_i. It can be a difference of species chemical potentials when conservation constraints eliminate other fractions. The dynamical derivative must declare whether composition is frozen or follows chemical equilibrium. The underlying first law and composition constraints are developed in Andersson and Comer 2021, §§ 2.1–2.2, Eqs. (2.1)–(2.32).

Consider a homogeneous equilibrium in a local Minkowski frame with ua=(1,0,0,0)u^a=(1,0,0,0), constant n0n_0, p0p_0, and ε0\varepsilon_0. This is an exact flat-spacetime calculation, or a local short-wavelength calculation neglecting background gradients and gravitational perturbations. Take adiabatic, fixed-composition perturbations proportional to ei(kx−ωt)e^{i(kx-\omega t)}. Linearized number and momentum conservation give

−iω δn+ikn0δv=0,-i\omega\,\delta n+i k n_0\delta v=0, −iω(ε0+p0)δv+ik δp=0.-i\omega(\varepsilon_0+p_0)\delta v+i k\,\delta p=0.

The first law at fixed ss gives δε=(ε0+p0)δn/n0\delta\varepsilon=(\varepsilon_0+p_0)\delta n/n_0, while the equation of state gives δp=cs2δε\delta p=c_s^2\delta\varepsilon. Eliminating δn\delta n and δv\delta v yields

ω2=cs2k2,cs2=(∂p∂ε)s,Yi.\omega^2=c_s^2 k^2, \qquad c_s^2=\left(\frac{\partial p}{\partial\varepsilon}\right)_{s,Y_i}.

This derivation checks the normalization: in units with c=1c=1, csc_s is dimensionless. Restoring units would compare the physical sound speed with cc, not change the thermodynamic derivative after energy density and pressure are expressed in the same units. The same local sound-wave calculation is given in Andersson and Comer 2021, § 7.2, Eqs. (7.20)–(7.34).

In a frame where the background fluid moves with one-dimensional velocity vv, special-relativistic velocity addition gives the two acoustic characteristic speeds

λ±=v±cs1±vcs.\lambda_\pm=\frac{v\pm c_s}{1\pm v c_s}.

They reduce to ±cs\pm c_s in the rest frame and approach the light cone only as cs→1c_s\to1. The material characteristic is λ0=v\lambda_0=v.

For this ideal, first-order fluid system with w>0w\gt0, cs2>0c_s^2\gt0 makes the acoustic frequencies real and supplies distinct sound characteristics away from degeneracies. If cs2<0c_s^2\lt0, a Fourier mode grows as e−cs2 ∣k∣te^{\sqrt{-c_s^2}\,\lvert k\rvert t}, signaling local mechanical instability and loss of hyperbolicity. At cs2=0c_s^2=0 the acoustic fields become degenerate and require separate analysis. This local test does not exclude gravitational instabilities such as long-wavelength Jeans growth.

Causality imposes

0≤cs2≤1.0\leq c_s^2\leq1.

The upper bound ensures that the local sound cone lies within or on the metric null cone. It is a necessary local test, but it does not by itself establish that a complicated constitutive theory is causal. Multi-fluid, elastic, magnetized, or dissipative systems have additional characteristic modes and relaxation variables. Conversely, a tabulated derivative slightly above unity can arise from interpolation error rather than the underlying model; one must distinguish a numerical defect from genuine superluminal stiffness.

Thermodynamic convexity supplies related but not identical conditions. Positive heat capacity, positive susceptibility matrices, and positive isentropic compressibility constrain different directions in state space. A one-parameter barotrope can hide unstable composition directions. Moreover, the dominant energy condition ∣p∣≤ε|p|\leq\varepsilon does not imply dp/dε≤1dp/d\varepsilon\leq1, and the derivative bound does not imply the dominant energy condition. They test different properties.

For a cold polytropic relation p=KnΓp=K n^\Gamma, with K,m>0K,m\gt0 and Γ>1\Gamma\gt1, take total energy density

ε=mn+pΓ−1,\varepsilon=mn+\frac{p}{\Gamma-1},

the sound speed is

cs2=Γpε+p.c_s^2=\frac{\Gamma p}{\varepsilon+p}.

At low pressure this becomes cs2≃Γp/(mn)c_s^2\simeq\Gamma p/(mn), the Newtonian result in c=1c=1 units. At extremely high pressure the formal limit is cs2→Γ−1c_s^2\to\Gamma-1; therefore a polytrope with Γ>2\Gamma\gt2 eventually becomes acausal if extrapolated indefinitely. This is an extrapolation failure, not evidence that the low-density fit was invalid where calibrated.

For an ultrarelativistic gas with p=ε/3p=\varepsilon/3, one recovers cs2=1/3c_s^2=1/3. Pressureless dust has cs=0c_s=0 and admits caustics rather than pressure-supported waves. A first-order phase transition can contain a constant-pressure coexistence interval with cs2=0c_s^2=0 in a Maxwell construction. These distinct limits show why “soft” and “unstable” are not synonyms.

For the cold polytrope above, derive cs2=Γp/(ε+p)c_s^2=\Gamma p/(\varepsilon+p) and determine the condition on Γ\Gamma for its high-pressure extrapolation to remain causal.

Solution

Differentiate with respect to nn:

dpdn=Γpn,dεdn=m+Γp(Γ−1)n=ε+pn.\frac{dp}{dn}=\frac{\Gamma p}{n}, \qquad \frac{d\varepsilon}{dn}=m+\frac{\Gamma p}{(\Gamma-1)n} =\frac{\varepsilon+p}{n}.

Their ratio gives cs2=(dp/dn)/(dε/dn)=Γp/(ε+p)c_s^2=(dp/dn)/(d\varepsilon/dn)=\Gamma p/(\varepsilon+p). When p≫mnp\gg mn, ε≃p/(Γ−1)\varepsilon\simeq p/(\Gamma-1), so cs2→Γ−1c_s^2\to\Gamma-1. The extrapolated model respects cs2≤1c_s^2\leq1 only for Γ≤2\Gamma\leq2; equality is the causal limiting value.

Can a barotrope obey the dominant energy condition over an interval while having superluminal sound? Test p=2(ε−ε∗)p=2(\varepsilon-\varepsilon_*) for ε∗>0\varepsilon_*>0 and ε∗≤ε≤2ε∗\varepsilon_*\leq\varepsilon\leq2\varepsilon_*.

Solution

On this interval 0≤p≤ε0\leq p\leq\varepsilon, so the perfect-fluid dominant energy condition holds. Nevertheless dp/dε=2dp/d\varepsilon=2, giving cs2=2c_s^2=2. The stress inequalities constrain values; causality constrains a derivative. This provides an explicit counterexample to treating them as the same condition.

  • Andersson, Nils, and Gregory L. Comer. “Relativistic Fluid Dynamics: Physics for Many Different Scales.” Living Reviews in Relativity 24, 3 (2021). DOI.