Skip to content

Newman–Penrose Polarization Classification

Scrollable formula. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal hidden content.

Scrollable table. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal additional columns.

Scrollable figure. Use Left and Right arrow keys to inspect hidden content.

The Newman–Penrose description classifies the tidal content of an approximately plane, null metric wave by projecting curvature onto a normalized null tetrad. In that regime, six real response amplitudes organize into two tensor, two vector, and two scalar patterns. The classification is kinematic: field equations decide which entries actually propagate, and general relativity in vacuum retains only the two tensor entries. It neither supplies alternative-theory dynamics nor reports empirical bounds.

Helpful background. Einstein Equations supplies the vacuum restriction that selects the GR class. Waves, Green Functions, and Geometric Optics supplies the plane-null-wave approximation. Gravitational Radiation and Waveforms supplies the volume’s strain, curvature, and Newman–Penrose signs. Tests of Gravity supplies the theory-specific interpretation beyond this kinematic classification.

Let uau^a be a unit future timelike observer and zaz^a a unit spatial vector in the wave-propagation direction. With transverse unit vectors xa,yax^a,y^a, define

ℓa=ua+za2,na=ua−za2,ma=xa+iya2.\ell^a=\frac{u^a+z^a}{\sqrt2}, \qquad n^a=\frac{u^a-z^a}{\sqrt2}, \qquad m^a=\frac{x^a+iy^a}{\sqrt2}.

For signature (−,+,+,+)(-,+,+,+),

ℓ⋅n=−1,m⋅mˉ=1,\ell\mathbin{\cdot}n=-1, \qquad m\mathbin{\cdot}\bar m=1,

and all other inner products vanish. The outgoing wave has phase uret=t−zu_{\rm ret}=t-z, tangent direction ℓa\ell^a, and the volume defines

Ψ4=−Cabcdnamˉbncmˉd.\Psi_4=-C_{abcd}n^a\bar m^b n^c\bar m^d.

For the other entries below, fix the complete projections

Ψ2=−Cabcdℓambmˉcnd,Ψ3=−Cabcdℓanbmˉcnd,Φ22=−12Rabnanb.\begin{aligned} \Psi_2&=-C_{abcd}\ell^a m^b\bar m^c n^d,\\ \Psi_3&=-C_{abcd}\ell^a n^b\bar m^c n^d,\\ \Phi_{22}&=-\frac12R_{ab}n^an^b. \end{aligned}

The Weyl-scalar conventions and symmetric null-tetrad normalization are those of Bishop and Rezzolla 2016, pp. 22–23, eqs. (95)–(103), PDF. The Ricci projection is stated separately because its sign also varies between references.

In the radiation zone this gives Ψ4=h¨+−ih¨×\Psi_4=\ddot h_+-i\ddot h_\times for h=h+−ih×h=h_+-ih_\times. Reversing the propagation vector, interchanging mm and mˉ\bar m, or rescaling ℓ\ell and nn changes component signs or boost weights, so a list of NP scalars without its tetrad is incomplete.

The observable object is the electric curvature Eij=R0i0j\mathcal E_{ij}=R_{0i0j} in the real triad (x,y,z)(x,y,z). In a common Eardley–Newman–Penrose normalization adapted to the tetrad above, the nearly plane null-wave matrix is

Eij=(−12(Re⁡Ψ4+Φ22)12Im⁡Ψ4−2Re⁡Ψ312Im⁡Ψ412(Re⁡Ψ4−Φ22)2Im⁡Ψ3−2Re⁡Ψ32Im⁡Ψ3−6Ψ2).\mathcal E_{ij}= \begin{pmatrix} -\tfrac12(\operatorname{Re}\Psi_4+\Phi_{22}) &\tfrac12\operatorname{Im}\Psi_4&-2\operatorname{Re}\Psi_3\\ \tfrac12\operatorname{Im}\Psi_4 &\tfrac12(\operatorname{Re}\Psi_4-\Phi_{22})&2\operatorname{Im}\Psi_3\\ -2\operatorname{Re}\Psi_3&2\operatorname{Im}\Psi_3&-6\Psi_2 \end{pmatrix}.

Here Φ22\Phi_{22} is real, Ψ3\Psi_3 is complex, and the plane-wave restrictions make the displayed Ψ2\Psi_2 real. For example, the projections give Ψ3=(−Exz+iEyz)/2\Psi_3=(-\mathcal E_{xz}+i\mathcal E_{yz})/2 and Ψ2=−Ezz/6\Psi_2=-\mathcal E_{zz}/6, directly checking the vector and longitudinal factors. Other NP references sometimes absorb factors or reverse the Riemann sign. The six real coefficients are therefore

curvature datatidal patternscharacter
Re⁡Ψ4,Im⁡Ψ4\operatorname{Re}\Psi_4,\operatorname{Im}\Psi_4plus, crosstransverse tensor
Re⁡Ψ3,Im⁡Ψ3\operatorname{Re}\Psi_3,\operatorname{Im}\Psi_3vector-xx, vector-yymixed transverse–longitudinal
Φ22\Phi_{22}breathingtransverse scalar
Ψ2\Psi_2longitudinalscalar along propagation

The classification through measurable curvature, rather than coordinate components, is the central construction of Eardley et al. 1973, pp. 884–886.

For a plane null wave, the little group preserving its propagation direction is the two-dimensional Euclidean group E(2). Null rotations can mix some NP components, so the invariant question is not simply whether one component vanishes in one arbitrary tetrad. The standard classes can be summarized as follows:

classinvariant leading conditionpossible patterns
II6\mathrm{II}_6Ψ2≠0\Psi_2\ne0all six
III5\mathrm{III}_5Ψ2=0\Psi_2=0, Ψ3≠0\Psi_3\ne0two vector, two tensor, breathing
N3\mathrm N_3Ψ2=Ψ3=0\Psi_2=\Psi_3=0, Ψ4≠0\Psi_4\ne0, Φ22≠0\Phi_{22}\ne0two tensor plus breathing
N2\mathrm N_2only Ψ4≠0\Psi_4\ne0two tensor
O1\mathrm O_1only Φ22≠0\Phi_{22}\ne0breathing
O0\mathrm O_0all radiative entries vanishno wave

The subscript counts the maximum number of observable polarization patterns in the class. A particular solution can occupy fewer patterns than its class permits.

For a weak vacuum wave in general relativity, Rab=0R_{ab}=0 removes Φ22\Phi_{22}, while the radiative peeling hierarchy and field equations remove the leading Ψ2\Psi_2 and Ψ3\Psi_3 entries from the plane-wave tidal field. What remains is

EijGR=(−12Re⁡Ψ412Im⁡Ψ4012Im⁡Ψ412Re⁡Ψ40000),\mathcal E_{ij}^{\rm GR}= \begin{pmatrix} -\tfrac12\operatorname{Re}\Psi_4& \tfrac12\operatorname{Im}\Psi_4&0\\ \tfrac12\operatorname{Im}\Psi_4& \tfrac12\operatorname{Re}\Psi_4&0\\ 0&0&0 \end{pmatrix},

which is transverse and trace free. Using Ψ4=h¨+−ih¨×\Psi_4=\ddot h_+-i\ddot h_\times reproduces Eij=−12h¨ijTT\mathcal E_{ij}=-\tfrac12\ddot h^{\rm TT}_{ij} exactly. Thus the GR result is class N2\mathrm N_2, not an assumption smuggled into the six-mode list.

E(2) classification assumes an approximately plane wave with a null propagation vector and wavelengths short compared with background-curvature scales. A massive or dispersive mode has a timelike wave vector and a different little group; its longitudinal and breathing response can also be frequency dependent. Curvature corrections beyond geometric optics can generate observer-dependent projections without introducing a new fundamental degree of freedom. Those cases require returning to the field equations and the full detector response rather than relabeling the six null patterns.

Treating six patterns as six universal degrees of freedom. Six is the maximum kinematic dimension of the symmetric tidal response under the stated metric and null-wave assumptions. A specified theory and background determine the propagating subset.

Reading an NP component without its tetrad. Boosts, spins, and null rotations alter components. State normalization, propagation direction, and dyad orientation before comparing signs.

1. Count and recover the GR entries. Starting from the displayed matrix, impose vacuum GR plane-wave conditions and verify the remaining independent components.

Solution

Vacuum removes the Ricci scalar Φ22\Phi_{22}. The GR plane-wave equations leave Ψ2=Ψ3=0\Psi_2=\Psi_3=0, so only the real and imaginary parts of Ψ4\Psi_4 remain. The resulting matrix is symmetric, has Ezz=0\mathcal E_{zz}=0, and obeys

Exx+Eyy=0.\mathcal E_{xx}+\mathcal E_{yy}=0.

It therefore has two independent transverse, trace-free components. Substitution of Ψ4=h¨+−ih¨×\Psi_4=\ddot h_+-i\ddot h_\times gives Exx=−h¨+/2\mathcal E_{xx}=-\ddot h_+/2 and Exy=−h¨×/2\mathcal E_{xy}=-\ddot h_\times/2, matching the volume’s plus-cross convention.

2. Identify a breathing-only response. Set every NP entry except Φ22\Phi_{22} to zero. What does a transverse ring do?

Solution

Then Exx=Eyy=−Φ22/2\mathcal E_{xx}=\mathcal E_{yy}=-\Phi_{22}/2, with all off-diagonal and longitudinal entries zero. Geodesic deviation accelerates every point of a transverse ring radially with the same sign at a given phase, so the ring expands and contracts isotropically rather than becoming an ellipse. This is the single pattern of class O1\mathrm O_1.

  • Bishop, Nigel T., and Luciano Rezzolla. “Extraction of Gravitational Waves in Numerical Relativity.” Living Reviews in Relativity 19 (2016): 2. DOI. Open PDF.
  • Eardley, Douglas M., David L. Lee, Alan P. Lightman, Robert V. Wagoner, and Clifford M. Will. “Gravitational-Wave Observations as a Tool for Testing Relativistic Gravity.” Physical Review Letters 30 (1973): 884–886. DOI.