Lorentz Transformations, Rapidity, and Velocity Addition
Scrollable formula. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal hidden content.
Scrollable table. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal additional columns.
Scrollable figure. Use Left and Right arrow keys to inspect hidden content.
The Lorentz transformation tells two inertial observers how to assign coordinates to the same events. Its mixing of space and time explains relativity of simultaneity, time dilation, and length contraction. A parameter called rapidity then makes successive boosts along one direction as easy to combine as ordinary rotation angles: their rapidities add, although their velocities do not.
Required background. Calculus and Linear Algebra provides linear maps, matrix composition, and hyperbolic functions; Variational Mechanics and Symmetries supplies the distinction between a trajectory and its description after a regular change of coordinates.
Lorentz boosts between inertial frames
Section titled “Lorentz boosts between inertial frames”Put the inertial frames in standard configuration: their spatial axes are parallel with no extra rotation, their origins coincide at , and moves with velocity relative to . We transform the coordinates of the same event from to . The worldline of the origin is , so the sign convention must make it satisfy :
with and . The inverse has the same form with .
Spacetime homogeneity and the inertial-chart structure make the transformation affine. The coincident origin event removes its constant term, leaving a linear map. In standard configuration, the condition along first gives . Requiring both null lines to remain null fixes . Substitution into
then yields , and continuity with the identity selects . This derives both the coefficients and their signs. Tong gives the corresponding construction in Tong 2013, §7.1, printed pp. 108–111 (PDF).
What clocks and rulers measure
Section titled “What clocks and rulers measure”Each familiar effect uses a different pair of events. Stating that pair prevents most apparent contradictions.
Simultaneity. Two separated flashes simultaneous in have . Their time separation in is , which generally is not zero. This is a comparison of synchronized clock readings, after accounting for light travel time; it is not merely a delay in seeing a distant flash.
Time dilation. Let two ticks occur on a clock at rest in . They obey , so the inverse boost gives
The moving clock records the proper time between its own ticks. The lattice records a longer coordinate interval. Exchanging and gives the reciprocal result for a different clock at rest in ; it does not compare the same pair of worldlines between a departure and a reunion.
Length contraction. A rod at rest along has rest length . To measure its length in , record the positions of its two ends at the same time, so . The spatial boost then gives
The two endpoint events are not simultaneous in , but its rod ends stay at fixed and their separation remains . For , : a one-second tick interval becomes seconds of laboratory time, and a five-metre rest length becomes four metres when measured simultaneously in the laboratory. These are measurement protocols, not a claim about a photograph, whose photons can leave the rod at different times. The derivations and their event choices are developed in Tong 2013, §§7.2.1–7.2.4, pp. 115–124, PDF.
Hyperbolic angle
Section titled “Hyperbolic angle”Define the rapidity by
The identity mirrors the invariant timelike norm. Unlike , which is restricted to , can be any real number; no finite rapidity reaches light speed.
On the plane, the boost is
Hyperbolic addition identities immediately give
Therefore two successive collinear frame velocities and produce
This is why rapidity, rather than velocity, is the natural group parameter; see Tong 2013, §7.3.2, printed pp. 128–131 (PDF).
For an object whose velocity in is , differentiating the boost gives
The minus sign here answers a different question from the plus sign in : it transforms an object’s velocity into a frame already moving at . Solving the first equation for the velocity of a second moving frame recovers the plus-sign composition law. The longitudinal and transverse formulas can be checked independently against Hughes 2024, Lecture 6, §6.1, printed pp. 46–47 (PDF).
The noncollinear boundary
Section titled “The noncollinear boundary”Rapidity adds as a scalar only for boosts along the same oriented line. Boosts in different directions do not commute:
Their product is generally a boost followed or preceded, depending on convention, by a spatial Wigner rotation. Thus “the rapidities add” must never be applied componentwise to noncollinear velocities. Ferraro and Thibeault 1999, Introduction and §II, pp. 1–3 (arXiv v1 PDF) derives this decomposition and fixes the Wigner-rotation terminology.
Collinear boosts form an Abelian one-parameter subgroup. Pure boosts in arbitrary directions do not form a subgroup at all, because their products need not be pure boosts. Closure is restored only after spatial rotations are included in the full Lorentz group.
Transfer check: two identical boosts
Section titled “Transfer check: two identical boosts”Frame moves at relative to , and moves at relative to , in the same direction. Find the velocity and Lorentz factor of relative to .
Solution
Since
the total rapidity is . Hence
Direct velocity addition gives the same result:
The total Lorentz factor is
As a cross-check, each individual is , and
The result stays below unity even though the Newtonian sum is . For small velocities the denominator tends to one, recovering ordinary addition.
The derivation assumes inertial frames and a constant relative velocity. It does not describe an accelerated coordinate system, and is a singular limit rather than a valid rest frame. The next page uses these boosts only as optional coordinate tools; the elapsed time itself is obtained invariantly from the worldline.
Proper Time, Worldlines, and the Clock Effect compares clocks without assigning causal power to acceleration.
References
Section titled “References”- Ferraro, Rafael, and Marc Thibeault. “Generic Composition of Boosts: An Elementary Derivation of the Wigner Rotation.” European Journal of Physics 20 (1999): 143–151. Introduction and §II, pp. 1–3 (arXiv:physics/0211022v1 PDF).
- Hughes, Scott A. Introduction to Relativity and Spacetime Physics. MIT 8.033 Lecture 6, especially §6.1, printed pp. 46–47 (PDF), Fall 2024.
- Tong, David. Dynamics and Relativity. §7.1, pp. 108–111; §§7.2.1–7.2.5, pp. 115–125; §7.3.2, pp. 128–131, PDF, University of Cambridge, Lent Term 2013. Signature translated from to .