Charged Black-Hole Spacetimes
Scrollable formula. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal hidden content.
Scrollable table. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal additional columns.
Scrollable figure. Use Left and Right arrow keys to inspect hidden content.
Reissner–Nordström and Kerr–Newman are the static spherical and stationary rotating black-hole families of four-dimensional, asymptotically flat Einstein–Maxwell theory. This record fixes one Gaussian-unit charge normalization and shows how mass, charge, and angular momentum determine the Killing horizons, stationary-limit surfaces, and admissible parameter regimes. These exact-family statements do not establish stability, formation, or observational relevance.
Helpful background. Lorentzian Metrics and Causal Cones supplies causal classification and chart regularity; Exact Solutions of Einstein’s Equations supplies the metric-field and domain-check method.
Einstein–Maxwell and charge normalization
Section titled “Einstein–Maxwell and charge normalization”Use with explicit, vanishing cosmological constant, and Gaussian electromagnetic units:
with away from sources. Define the electric and magnetic charges by flux at an enclosing two-sphere,
and set
Assume and take . Thus , , and have dimensions of length. A convention that absorbs or into charge must translate the stress tensor, flux definition, metric coefficient, and potential together; replacing only the printed term is inconsistent.
The Black-Hole Geometry mechanics pages use rationalized charge. The complete Gaussian-to-rationalized Maxwell map shows why both conventions give the same , stress tensor, and first-law work term when the entire package is rescaled.
Reissner–Nordström
Section titled “Reissner–Nordström”In areal radius , the dyonic field and metric are
The electric gauge vanishes at infinity. When , the magnetic potential must instead be given on overlapping angular patches; a string in one potential is not a singularity of .
The radial roots are
For they are two simple Killing horizons, for they merge into one double horizon, and for no real horizon root exists. At the neutral endpoint , only is a horizon: the formal value is the Schwarzschild curvature singularity, where is undefined. In the charged subextremal maximal extension, is the outer event and Killing horizon and is an inner Cauchy and Killing horizon. The event-horizon statement uses that global extension; it does not follow from alone.
With , the metric becomes
Its radial block has determinant at either regular horizon root, and the electric part of is . The advanced chart therefore crosses a selected future horizon without a metric or field singularity. Bičák compares the three root regimes and their analytic blocks in Bičák 2000, §3, printed pp. 31–41, PDF.
The complete metric-field derivation is The Reissner–Nordström Solution; chart domains and extension cautions are treated in Reissner–Nordström Horizons and Extensions.
Kerr–Newman
Section titled “Kerr–Newman”For the rotating family, define
The Boyer–Lindquist metric can be written compactly as
For a purely electric member, use the gauge
which vanishes at the chosen asymptotically flat end. Magnetic charge can be added at the field-strength level by electromagnetic duality, but its potential remains patchwise. Newman and collaborators give the defining rotating charged metric in Newman et al. 1965, pp. 918–919.
The ingoing differentials
remove the Boyer–Lindquist metric pole at a selected future horizon. In these coordinates the displayed electric potential acquires the radial term . That term is locally exact and can be removed by a gauge transformation, leaving
whose field strength is regular at a regular horizon. A divergent component of in one gauge is therefore not evidence that is singular.
Horizons, ergosurfaces, and domains
Section titled “Horizons, ergosurfaces, and domains”The Kerr–Newman algebraic radial roots and stationary-limit surfaces are
| Family | Black-hole parameter domain | Killing horizons | Stationary limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reissner–Nordström | at when ; at , only is a horizon | Coincides with because the geometry is static | |
| Kerr–Newman | at unless , when is not a horizon | at ; for , the outer surface meets only on the rotation axis, while for it coincides with at every angle |
Equality gives a double root. Strict inequality with gives distinct outer and inner horizons; the joint neutral, nonrotating endpoint is Schwarzschild and has only the outer horizon. Beyond the stated bound, the formally superextremal electrovac metric still solves the local field equations away from its singular locus, but it is not a black-hole member of the family.
For the outer horizon, the normalized generator is
In the asymptotically vanishing electric gauge,
independent of . This constancy checks both the horizon generator and gauge regularity. It does not make the potential itself gauge invariant.
The four loci must remain distinct: gives Boyer–Lindquist horizon candidates, gives stationary limits, and is the angular-coordinate axis. On the rotating branch , is the ring curvature singularity; at , it is instead the central locus . The exact rotating metric, field, and limiting cases are developed in The Kerr–Newman Electrovacuum.
Checks and limitations
Section titled “Checks and limitations”The Maxwell stress tensor is trace free in four dimensions, so every member obeys . For nonzero charge the Ricci tensor is nevertheless nonzero: does not mean vacuum. The and asymptotic coefficients and the two flux integrals independently check the mass and charge normalizations.
Three limits connect the families: gives Kerr, gives Reissner–Nordström, and gives Schwarzschild.
These are family maps; the coordinate and gauge choices must also have smooth limits. Analytic extensions of the exact subextremal solutions with contain ideal inner Cauchy horizons and additional blocks; the Schwarzschild endpoint does not. Their perturbative survival, dynamical formation, censorship status, mechanics, thermodynamics, and empirical relevance lie outside this lookup record.
References
Section titled “References”- Bičák, Jiří. “The Role of Exact Solutions of Einstein’s Equations in the Developments of General Relativity and Astrophysics: Selected Themes.” In Einstein’s Field Equations and Their Physical Implications, edited by Bernd G. Schmidt, 1–126. Lecture Notes in Physics 540. Springer, 2000. Open PDF.
- Newman, Ezra T., Evelyn Couch, K. Chinnapared, A. Exton, A. Prakash, and Robert Torrence. “Metric of a Rotating, Charged Mass.” Journal of Mathematical Physics 6, no. 6 (1965): 918–919. DOI.