Skip to content

The Reissner–Nordström Solution

Scrollable formula. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal hidden content.

Scrollable table. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal additional columns.

Scrollable figure. Use Left and Right arrow keys to inspect hidden content.

Within four-dimensional, asymptotically flat, static, spherically symmetric electrovac, the construction below yields the Reissner–Nordström metric-field family. The complementary classification statement comes from the electrovac Birkhoff theorem: on its nonconstant-areal-radius branch, every local spherically symmetric electrovac solution with Λ=0\Lambda=0 is locally of this form. The central result is

f(r)=1−2GMr+G(Qe2+Qm2)r2.f(r)=1-\frac{2GM}{r} +\frac{G(Q_e^2+Q_m^2)}{r^2}.

The plus sign of the charge term is not inserted by analogy: it follows from the positive electromagnetic energy outside each symmetry sphere. This page derives that statement without assuming the final relation between the temporal and radial metric coefficients. It treats the local metric-field solution; roots, horizon-crossing charts, and analytic extensions belong to Reissner–Nordström horizons and extensions.

Required background. The Einstein Equation supplies the coupling of geometry to Maxwell stress–energy.

Helpful background. Deriving the Schwarzschild Metric introduces the same mass-function and time-normalization strategy. Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms supplies Hodge duals and flux integrals, while Stress–Energy and Conservation supplies the observer interpretation of TμνT_{\mu\nu}; the most direct applications are electromagnetism with differential forms and electromagnetic stress–energy. The Riemann Curvature Tensor supports the Ricci checks, and Exact Solutions of Einstein’s Equations explains how to specify a spacetime and its matter fields. Causality and Global Structure and Affine and Variational Geodesics are needed only for the following horizons-and-extensions page and may be deferred.

Use four-dimensional Einstein–Maxwell theory with Λ=0\Lambda=0 and Gaussian electromagnetic normalization:

Gμν=8πGTμν,dF=0,d⋆F=0,G_{\mu\nu}=8\pi G T_{\mu\nu}, \qquad dF=0, \qquad d\star F=0, Tμν=14π(FμαFνα−14gμνFαβFαβ).T_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{4\pi} \left( F_{\mu\alpha}F_\nu{}^\alpha -\frac14g_{\mu\nu}F_{\alpha\beta}F^{\alpha\beta} \right).

Here electrovac means that the Maxwell field is source-free and supplies the only stress–energy on the domain under study. “Source-free” means that the local current vanishes there. It does not force the flux through a sphere to vanish: a sphere surrounding the omitted region r=0r=0 is not the boundary of a three-ball contained in the punctured domain. Allowing both electric and magnetic flux is called the dyonic case.

Begin on a connected asymptotically flat static interval with r>0r>0 and

ds2=−e2Φ(r)dt2+a(r)−1dr2+r2dΩ22,a(r)>0.ds^2=-e^{2\Phi(r)}dt^2 +a(r)^{-1}dr^2+r^2d\Omega_2^2, \qquad a(r)>0.

Here rr is the areal radius: every symmetry sphere has geometric area 4πr24\pi r^2. Also t∈Rt\in\mathbb R, 0<θ<π0<\theta<\pi, and ϕ\phi has period 2π2\pi. The angular coordinates degenerate at the two axes, but the round spheres are smooth there. Choose ∂t\partial_t future-directed at the selected asymptotic end. A convenient oriented orthonormal coframe is

e0^=eΦdt,e1^=dra,e2^=r dθ,e3^=rsin⁡θ dϕ.e^{\hat0}=e^\Phi dt, \qquad e^{\hat1}=\frac{dr}{\sqrt a}, \qquad e^{\hat2}=r\,d\theta, \qquad e^{\hat3}=r\sin\theta\,d\phi.

Spherical symmetry permits one radial electric component and one radial magnetic component. With the site orientation,

F=−E(r)e0^∧e1^+B(r)e2^∧e3^,F=-E(r)e^{\hat0}\wedge e^{\hat1} +B(r)e^{\hat2}\wedge e^{\hat3}, ⋆(e0^∧e1^)=−e2^∧e3^,⋆(e2^∧e3^)=e0^∧e1^.\star(e^{\hat0}\wedge e^{\hat1}) =-e^{\hat2}\wedge e^{\hat3}, \qquad \star(e^{\hat2}\wedge e^{\hat3}) =e^{\hat0}\wedge e^{\hat1}.

Before assigning the flux constants, write both two-forms in the coordinate basis:

F=EeΦa dr∧dt+Br2sin⁡θ dθ∧dϕ,⋆F=Er2sin⁡θ dθ∧dϕ−BeΦa dr∧dt.\begin{aligned} F&=\frac{E e^\Phi}{\sqrt a}\,dr\wedge dt +Br^2\sin\theta\,d\theta\wedge d\phi,\\ \star F&=Er^2\sin\theta\,d\theta\wedge d\phi -\frac{B e^\Phi}{\sqrt a}\,dr\wedge dt. \end{aligned}

Taking exterior derivatives gives the entire radial Maxwell calculation:

dF=(r2B)′ dr∧sin⁡θ dθ∧dϕ,d⋆F=(r2E)′ dr∧sin⁡θ dθ∧dϕ.\begin{aligned} dF&=(r^2B)'\,dr\wedge\sin\theta\,d\theta\wedge d\phi,\\ d\star F&=(r^2E)'\,dr\wedge\sin\theta\,d\theta\wedge d\phi. \end{aligned}

The factors eΦ/ae^\Phi/\sqrt a occur only in terms proportional to dr∧dtdr\wedge dt; differentiating their radial coefficients produces dr∧dr∧dt=0dr\wedge dr\wedge dt=0. Thus the unknown metric functions cancel without assuming e2Φ=ae^{2\Phi}=a. Maxwell’s equations now give

r2E=Qe,r2B=Qm,r^2E=Q_e, \qquad r^2B=Q_m,

Orienting each sphere by sin⁡θ dθ∧dϕ\sin\theta\,d\theta\wedge d\phi identifies these constants with the geometric fluxes

Qe=14π∫Sr2⋆F,Qm=14π∫Sr2F,Q_e=\frac{1}{4\pi}\int_{S_r^2}\star F, \qquad Q_m=\frac{1}{4\pi}\int_{S_r^2}F,

and the integrals immediately recover the signed orthonormal components

E(r)=Qer2,B(r)=Qmr2.E(r)=\frac{Q_e}{r^2}, \qquad B(r)=\frac{Q_m}{r^2}.

The hats E^r≡E(r)\widehat E_r\equiv E(r) and B^r≡B(r)\widehat B_r\equiv B(r) used in the figure below emphasize that these are orthonormal radial components, not spherical-coordinate components of the two-form.

Before solving Einstein’s equation, the coordinate two-form is therefore

F=QeeΦr2a dr∧dt+Qmsin⁡θ dθ∧dϕ.F=\frac{Q_e e^\Phi}{r^2\sqrt a}\,dr\wedge dt +Q_m\sin\theta\,d\theta\wedge d\phi.

The factor eΦ/ae^\Phi/\sqrt a is essential at this stage. Replacing it by one before deriving e2Φ=ae^{2\Phi}=a would make the argument circular.

Define Q2≡Qe2+Qm2Q^2\equiv Q_e^2+Q_m^2. In the orthonormal frame the mixed stress tensor is

Ta^b^=ρ diag⁡(−1,−1,1,1),ρ=Q28πr4.T^{\hat a}{}_{\hat b} =\rho\,\operatorname{diag}(-1,-1,1,1), \qquad \rho=\frac{Q^2}{8\pi r^4}.

Thus a static observer measures positive energy density ρ\rho. The radial principal pressure is pr=−ρp_r=-\rho, a tension along the field lines, while the two tangential pressures are pθ=pϕ=ρp_\theta=p_\phi=\rho. The trace vanishes:

Ta^a^=−ρ−ρ+ρ+ρ=0.T^{\hat a}{}_{\hat a} =-\rho-\rho+\rho+\rho=0.

Tracelessness will imply R=0R=0, but it does not imply Rμν=0R_{\mu\nu}=0. Electromagnetism is matter even when its stress tensor has zero trace.

Because rr is itself a geometrically defined scalar, gμν∇μr∇νr=a(r)g^{\mu\nu}\nabla_\mu r\nabla_\nu r=a(r) in this chart. Define the Misner–Sharp mass mMSm_{\rm MS} invariantly by

1−2GmMS(r)r≡gμν∇μr∇νr=a(r),1-\frac{2Gm_{\rm MS}(r)}{r} \equiv g^{\mu\nu}\nabla_\mu r\nabla_\nu r =a(r),

and abbreviate it to m(r)m(r) below. This is a geometric definition, not an arbitrary reparametrization of the radial metric coefficient.

For the unsolved metric, the two radial mixed Einstein components are

Gtt=ra′+a−1r2=−2Gm′r2,Grr=2raΦ′+a−1r2.\begin{aligned} G^t{}_t &=\frac{ra'+a-1}{r^2} =-\frac{2Gm'}{r^2},\\ G^r{}_r &=\frac{2ra\Phi'+a-1}{r^2}. \end{aligned}

The tttt equation, Gtt=8πGTtt=−8πGρG^t{}_t=8\pi G T^t{}_t=-8\pi G\rho, gives

m′(r)=4πr2ρ(r)=Q22r2.m'(r)=4\pi r^2\rho(r) =\frac{Q^2}{2r^2}.

Let M=lim⁡r→∞m(r)M=\lim_{r\to\infty}m(r); at the normalized asymptotically flat end this is the ADM mass. It is independent boundary data. The charge fixes the radial variation m′(r)m'(r), but it does not determine MM, which can also encode the mass associated with the omitted interior. Integration yields

m(r)=M−Q22r.m(r)=M-\frac{Q^2}{2r}.

The equality Ttt=TrrT^t{}_t=T^r{}_r requires Gtt=GrrG^t{}_t=G^r{}_r. Subtracting the displayed components gives

a′=2aΦ′,e2Φ=Ca.a'=2a\Phi', \qquad e^{2\Phi}=C a.

Asymptotic flatness fixes a→1a\to1. Rescaling the Killing time so that gtt→−1g_{tt}\to-1 fixes C=1C=1. Hence e2Φ=a≡fe^{2\Phi}=a\equiv f, and the solution becomes

ds2=−f(r)dt2+dr2f(r)+r2dΩ22,ds^2=-f(r)dt^2 +\frac{dr^2}{f(r)} +r^2d\Omega_2^2, f(r)=1−2GMr+GQ2r2,Q2=Qe2+Qm2,f(r)=1-\frac{2GM}{r} +\frac{GQ^2}{r^2}, \qquad Q^2=Q_e^2+Q_m^2, F=Qer2 dr∧dt+Qmsin⁡θ dθ∧dϕ.F=\frac{Q_e}{r^2}\,dr\wedge dt +Q_m\sin\theta\,d\theta\wedge d\phi.

The sign of the charge term now has a transparent origin. The exact areal-radius mass balance assigns the field outside a sphere the contribution

M−m(r)=∫r∞4πR2ρ(R) dR=Q22r>0.M-m(r) =\int_r^\infty4\pi R^2\rho(R)\,dR =\frac{Q^2}{2r}>0.

Substituting the smaller interior mass m(r)=M−Q2/(2r)m(r)=M-Q^2/(2r) into 1−2Gm(r)/r1-2Gm(r)/r turns the second minus sign into the positive GQ2/r2GQ^2/r^2 term. This integral follows from the spherical Einstein equation; it is not a flat-space proper-volume integral on a t=constantt=\text{constant} slice.

The complete chain is summarized in the figure. Follow the fluxes to their r−2r^{-2} fields, then read downward from the positive r−4r^{-4} energy density to the metric function.

Conserved electric and magnetic flux through a sphere gives inverse-square fields, positive inverse-fourth-power energy density, exterior mass contribution Q squared over 2r, and therefore a positive charge correction in the metric.

On the source-free exterior, electric and magnetic fluxes give E^r=Qe/r2\widehat E_r=Q_e/r^2 and B^r=Qm/r2\widehat B_r=Q_m/r^2. The upper panel is schematic and shows outward arrows for positive charges; reversing either charge reverses the corresponding arrows without changing the metric. The lower panel is the exact areal-radius Einstein mass balance: positive ρ=Q2/(8πr4)\rho=Q^2/(8\pi r^4) gives M−m(r)=Q2/(2r)M-m(r)=Q^2/(2r) and therefore f=1−2GM/r+GQ2/r2f=1-2GM/r+GQ^2/r^2. The displayed integral is not a proper-volume integral on a static slice.

Bičák displays the electric member of this family in geometrized units in Bičák 2000, §3, printed pp. 31–32, Eqs. (9)–(10), Open PDF. For that electric solution, the translation is mB=GMm_{\rm B}=GM, qB2=GQe2q_{\rm B}^2=GQ_e^2, and FB=G FeF_{\rm B}=\sqrt G\,F_e in the Gaussian normalization used here. The dyonic metric follows by the independently checked duality-invariant replacement Qe2↦Qe2+Qm2Q_e^2\mapsto Q_e^2+Q_m^2; the magnetic field, flux signs, stress tensor, and radial calculation above are not claims about what is printed in that electric-only passage.

One field strength, two magnetic gauge patches

Section titled “One field strength, two magnetic gauge patches”

After e2Φ=ae^{2\Phi}=a is known, the final two-form can be written locally as F=dAF=d\mathcal A. When Qm≠0Q_m\ne0, no one smooth potential covers an entire symmetry sphere. Useful north and south potentials are

AN=−Qer dt+Qm(1−cos⁡θ) dϕ,AS=−Qer dt−Qm(1+cos⁡θ) dϕ.\begin{aligned} \mathcal A_N &=-\frac{Q_e}{r}\,dt +Q_m(1-\cos\theta)\,d\phi,\\ \mathcal A_S &=-\frac{Q_e}{r}\,dt -Q_m(1+\cos\theta)\,d\phi. \end{aligned}

Both give the same FF. The first is regular at the north axis and the second at the south axis; on their overlap,

AN−AS=2Qm dϕ.\mathcal A_N-\mathcal A_S=2Q_m\,d\phi.

The apparent axial singularity of either individual potential is a patch artifact. On the overlap the difference is locally the gauge transformation d(2Qmϕ)d(2Q_m\phi), but ϕ\phi is not a single-valued real function around the equator. The obstruction to one global smooth potential is seen directly from Stokes’ theorem: if F=dAF=d\mathcal A held globally on a symmetry sphere, then

∫S2F=∫S2dA=∫∂S2A=0,\int_{S^2}F =\int_{S^2}d\mathcal A =\int_{\partial S^2}\mathcal A =0,

contradicting ∫S2F=4πQm\int_{S^2}F=4\pi Q_m when Qm≠0Q_m\ne0. No charge quantization is assumed here; that would require additional global information about the gauge group and charged matter.

Substitution into the complete field equations gives

Gμν=GQ2r4diag⁡(−1,−1,1,1)=8πGTμν,G^\mu{}_{\nu} =\frac{GQ^2}{r^4} \operatorname{diag}(-1,-1,1,1) =8\pi G T^\mu{}_{\nu},

with every off-diagonal component zero. The angular equation is therefore satisfied as well as the two radial equations. The Hodge dual of the final field is

⋆F=Qesin⁡θ dθ∧dϕ−Qmr2 dr∧dt,\star F =Q_e\sin\theta\,d\theta\wedge d\phi -\frac{Q_m}{r^2}\,dr\wedge dt,

so dF=d⋆F=0dF=d\star F=0 on each displayed diagonal-chart component with r>0r>0 and f≠0f\ne0, both flux integrals recover their defining charges, and ⋆2F=−F\star^2F=-F. Extending that statement through a root of ff first requires a horizon-regular chart. The two quadratic electromagnetic invariants are

FμνFμν=2(Qm2−Qe2)r4,Fμν(⋆F)μν=4QeQmr4.\begin{aligned} F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu} &=\frac{2(Q_m^2-Q_e^2)}{r^4},\\ F_{\mu\nu}(\star F)^{\mu\nu} &=\frac{4Q_eQ_m}{r^4}. \end{aligned}

The second sign follows from ϵtrθϕ=+−g\epsilon_{tr\theta\phi}=+\sqrt{-g}, the site Hodge convention, and the ordering dr∧dtdr\wedge dt in FF.

For a constant duality angle β\beta, define

Fβ=Fcos⁡β+⋆Fsin⁡β.F_\beta=F\cos\beta+\star F\sin\beta.

Since ⋆2=−1\star^2=-1 on two-forms, its flux charges are

(Qe,βQm,β)=(cos⁡β−sin⁡βsin⁡βcos⁡β)(QeQm),\begin{pmatrix}Q_{e,\beta}\\ Q_{m,\beta}\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \cos\beta&-\sin\beta\\ \sin\beta&\cos\beta \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}Q_e\\Q_m\end{pmatrix},

so Qe,β2+Qm,β2=Q2Q_{e,\beta}^2+Q_{m,\beta}^2=Q^2. For Q>0Q>0, writing Qe=Qcos⁡αQ_e=Q\cos\alpha and Qm=Qsin⁡αQ_m=Q\sin\alpha makes the action simply α↦α+β\alpha\mapsto\alpha+\beta. The neutral case Q=0Q=0 needs no angle. The metric and stress tensor remember only Q2Q^2, whereas the ordered invariant pair changes with 2α2\alpha. Even that pair determines α\alpha only modulo π\pi, because FF and −F-F have the same quadratic invariants. Thus two solutions can have the same metric while differing as metric-field solutions.

Tracing Einstein’s equation gives R=0R=0. For Q≠0Q\ne0, however, the displayed Einstein tensor proves that Rμν≠0R_{\mu\nu}\ne0. The detailed curvature invariants and the central singularity test are developed on invariants, singularities, and controlled limits.

The derivation began on the asymptotically flat static component, where f>0f>0 and ∂t\partial_t is timelike. The final diagonal coordinates define a Lorentzian chart on any connected interval with r>0r>0 and f≠0f\ne0; where f<0f<0, rr is timelike and tt is spacelike. A zero of ff is excluded from this diagonal chart, not automatically from the spacetime. Its regular extension and causal meaning require the next page.

Three checks should be immediate:

OperationResultWhat it checks
Qe=Qm=0Q_e=Q_m=0Schwarzschild with f=1−2GM/rf=1-2GM/rNeutral limit and mass normalization
M=Qe=Qm=0M=Q_e=Q_m=0Minkowski metric on the r>0r>0 spherical chart; its regular centre may then be adjoinedJoint flat limit and the distinction between a chart domain and the completed flat spacetime
r→∞r\to\inftygtt=−1+2GM/r+O(r−2)g_{tt}=-1+2GM/r+O(r^{-2}) and Fa^b^=O(r−2)F_{\hat a\hat b}=O(r^{-2})ADM mass and asymptotic flatness

The local solution allows real M,Qe,QmM,Q_e,Q_m. Black-hole parameter restrictions, root multiplicities, extremality, and the distinction between Killing, event, and Cauchy horizons are deliberately deferred to Reissner–Nordström horizons and extensions. In rationalized units, or when GG is absorbed into charge, the printed charge term changes; use the complete Gaussian-to-rationalized map rather than restoring one factor in isolation.

Source-free does not mean zero flux. It means dF=d⋆F=0dF=d\star F=0 on the domain. A sphere surrounding an omitted region can carry nonzero conserved flux.

The positive charge term does not represent negative field energy. The energy density is positive. The plus sign appears because the mass function inside radius rr is the asymptotic mass minus the positive exterior field contribution.

Zero scalar curvature does not mean vacuum or flatness. Maxwell stress is trace free, so R=0R=0, but RμνR_{\mu\nu} and the full curvature remain nonzero when Q≠0Q\ne0.

The metric does not determine the electromagnetic field. It fixes Qe2+Qm2Q_e^2+Q_m^2, not the charge signs or electric–magnetic duality angle.

A gauge-potential singularity need not be a field singularity. For magnetic charge, north and south potentials are individually regular on their own patches and produce one smooth field strength on the sphere.

Recover the coordinate field without circular reasoning

Section titled “Recover the coordinate field without circular reasoning”

Starting from the orthonormal coframe and

F=−Qer2e0^∧e1^+Qmr2e2^∧e3^,F=-\frac{Q_e}{r^2}e^{\hat0}\wedge e^{\hat1} +\frac{Q_m}{r^2}e^{\hat2}\wedge e^{\hat3},

derive the coordinate expression before and after e2Φ=ae^{2\Phi}=a is known.

Solution

The coframe gives

e0^∧e1^=eΦa dt∧dr,e2^∧e3^=r2sin⁡θ dθ∧dϕ.e^{\hat0}\wedge e^{\hat1} =\frac{e^\Phi}{\sqrt a}\,dt\wedge dr, \qquad e^{\hat2}\wedge e^{\hat3} =r^2\sin\theta\,d\theta\wedge d\phi.

Because dt∧dr=−dr∧dtdt\wedge dr=-dr\wedge dt,

F=QeeΦr2a dr∧dt+Qmsin⁡θ dθ∧dϕ.F=\frac{Q_e e^\Phi}{r^2\sqrt a}\,dr\wedge dt +Q_m\sin\theta\,d\theta\wedge d\phi.

Only after the Einstein equations and asymptotic normalization give e2Φ=ae^{2\Phi}=a does the ratio become one, producing the final coordinate field.

Use the orthonormal electric and magnetic components to verify the displayed stress tensor, including its trace.

Solution

The electric and magnetic fields are parallel to the radial basis vector. In Gaussian units the energy density is

ρ=E2+B28π=Qe2+Qm28πr4.\rho=\frac{E^2+B^2}{8\pi} =\frac{Q_e^2+Q_m^2}{8\pi r^4}.

For orthonormal spatial indices, the Maxwell tensor can be written

T0^0^=E2+B28π,Ti^j^=18π[(E2+B2)δij−2(EiEj+BiBj)].T_{\hat0\hat0}=\frac{E^2+B^2}{8\pi}, \qquad T_{\hat i\hat j} =\frac{1}{8\pi} \left[(E^2+B^2)\delta_{ij} -2(E_iE_j+B_iB_j)\right].

Choose the first spatial basis vector to be radial. Then Ei=(E,0,0)E_i=(E,0,0) and Bi=(B,0,0)B_i=(B,0,0), so

T1^1^=−ρ,T2^2^=T3^3^=ρ.T_{\hat1\hat1}=-\rho, \qquad T_{\hat2\hat2}=T_{\hat3\hat3}=\rho.

Raising the first index changes the sign of the time component but not the spatial components. Hence

Ta^b^=diag⁡(−ρ,−ρ,ρ,ρ),T^{\hat a}{}_{\hat b} =\operatorname{diag}(-\rho,-\rho,\rho,\rho),

whose trace is −ρ−ρ+ρ+ρ=0-\rho-\rho+\rho+\rho=0.

Integrate the mass equation using m(∞)=Mm(\infty)=M and recover f(r)f(r).

Solution

From m′=Q2/(2r2)m'=Q^2/(2r^2),

M−m(r)=∫r∞Q22R2 dR=Q22r.M-m(r)=\int_r^\infty\frac{Q^2}{2R^2}\,dR =\frac{Q^2}{2r}.

Therefore m=M−Q2/(2r)m=M-Q^2/(2r), and

1−2Gmr=1−2GMr+GQ2r2.1-\frac{2Gm}{r} =1-\frac{2GM}{r}+\frac{GQ^2}{r^2}.

The field energy is positive; the plus sign results from subtracting that positive exterior contribution from the asymptotic mass before inserting m(r)m(r) into the metric.

For a metric ds2=−fdt2+f−1dr2+r2dΩ22ds^2=-fdt^2+f^{-1}dr^2+r^2d\Omega_2^2, the mixed angular component is

Gθθ=Gϕϕ=12f′′+f′r.G^\theta{}_\theta =G^\phi{}_\phi =\frac12f''+\frac{f'}{r}.

Substitute the Reissner–Nordström function and compare with Maxwell stress. Why is this also consistent with the Bianchi identity?

Solution

For

f=1−2GMr+GQ2r2,f=1-\frac{2GM}{r}+\frac{GQ^2}{r^2},

direct differentiation gives

12f′′+f′r=GQ2r4=8πGTθθ.\frac12f''+\frac{f'}r =\frac{GQ^2}{r^4} =8\pi G T^\theta{}_\theta.

The same holds for the ϕ\phi component. More structurally, ∇μGμν=0\nabla_\mu G^\mu{}_\nu=0 by the contracted Bianchi identity, while the source-free Maxwell equation gives ∇μTμν=0\nabla_\mu T^\mu{}_\nu=0. Once the two independent radial Einstein equations and Maxwell’s equation hold on a regular radial interval, the conservation identity makes the angular residual dependent rather than a new integration equation. Direct substitution verifies the result without relying on that structural argument alone.

Prove why magnetic charge needs two gauge patches

Section titled “Prove why magnetic charge needs two gauge patches”

Verify that the north and south potentials give the same magnetic field, find their difference on the overlap, and use Stokes’ theorem to rule out one globally smooth potential on S2S^2 when Qm≠0Q_m\ne0.

Solution

Restricting to a sphere of fixed tt and rr gives

d ⁣[Qm(1−cos⁡θ)dϕ]=Qmsin⁡θ dθ∧dϕ,d\!\left[Q_m(1-\cos\theta)d\phi\right] =Q_m\sin\theta\,d\theta\wedge d\phi,

and the same derivative follows from −Qm(1+cos⁡θ)dϕ-Q_m(1+\cos\theta)d\phi. Their overlap difference is 2Qmdϕ=d(2Qmϕ)2Q_m d\phi=d(2Q_m\phi) locally. If a single smooth potential existed on the whole sphere, however, then

4πQm=∫S2F=∫S2dA=∫∂S2A=0,4\pi Q_m=\int_{S^2}F=\int_{S^2}d\mathcal A =\int_{\partial S^2}\mathcal A=0,

which is impossible for Qm≠0Q_m\ne0. The two-patch description is therefore not optional gauge clutter; it represents the nonzero magnetic flux.

Rotate electric charge into magnetic charge

Section titled “Rotate electric charge into magnetic charge”

For Fβ=Fcos⁡β+⋆Fsin⁡βF_\beta=F\cos\beta+\star F\sin\beta, derive the transformed electric and magnetic charges and show that the metric function is unchanged.

Solution

Using ⋆2F=−F\star^2F=-F,

⋆Fβ=⋆Fcos⁡β−Fsin⁡β.\star F_\beta=\star F\cos\beta-F\sin\beta.

Integrating ⋆Fβ\star F_\beta and FβF_\beta over a symmetry sphere gives

Qe,β=Qecos⁡β−Qmsin⁡β,Qm,β=Qesin⁡β+Qmcos⁡β.Q_{e,\beta}=Q_e\cos\beta-Q_m\sin\beta, \qquad Q_{m,\beta}=Q_e\sin\beta+Q_m\cos\beta.

This is an ordinary rotation, so Qe,β2+Qm,β2=Qe2+Qm2Q_{e,\beta}^2+Q_{m,\beta}^2=Q_e^2+Q_m^2. The lapse depends on the charges only through this sum, and therefore remains unchanged. For example, a purely electric field with Qe=QQ_e=Q, Qm=0Q_m=0 becomes purely magnetic at β=π/2\beta=\pi/2.

  • Bičák, Jiří. “Selected Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations: Their Role in General Relativity and Astrophysics.” In Einstein’s Field Equations and Their Physical Implications, edited by Bernd G. Schmidt, Lecture Notes in Physics 540, 1–126. Berlin: Springer, 2000. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-46580-4_1. Open PDF.