Skip to content

Mode Green Functions and Wronskians

Scrollable formula. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal hidden content.

Scrollable table. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal additional columns.

Scrollable figure. Use Left and Right arrow keys to inspect hidden content.

A radial Green function is assembled from two homogeneous solutions, each satisfying one endpoint condition. The value matches continuously at the source, while its derivative jumps by exactly the amount needed to create a delta function. This page derives that normalization for a separated black-hole master equation, then treats weighted radial operators and delta-prime sources. The central lesson is that the operator, source measure, and endpoint normalization form one calculation.

Required background. PDEs and Green Functions for Gravitation supplies distributional matching, Fourier–Laplace transforms, and Green identities.

Helpful background. Black-Hole Geometry and Mechanics fixes the horizon and outer endpoint; Formulations of General Relativity supplies wave operators; Events, Intervals, and Minkowski Geometry fixes causal orientation; Black-Hole Perturbation Theory introduces the master fields.

Start with a massless Schwarzschild master equation in tortoise coordinate x=r∗x=r_*, suppressing the fixed angular labels:

[−∂t2+∂x2−Vℓ(x)]Ψ(t,x)=S(t,x).[-\partial_t^2+\partial_x^2-V_\ell(x)]\Psi(t,x)=S(t,x).

Here VℓV_\ell is a smooth real potential, with the usual decaying Schwarzschild endpoint behavior. Take a smooth compactly supported source that vanishes for t≤0t\leq0, and zero past field and velocity. This avoids initial-slice source terms and noncompact-source convergence issues; those are separate from the radial matching problem.

For a response growing no faster than eγte^{\gamma t} in the relevant norm, choose η>max⁡(γ,0)\eta\gt\max(\gamma,0) and use

Ψ~(ω,x)=∫0∞eiωtΨ(t,x) dt,Ψ(t,x)=12π∫−∞+iη+∞+iηe−iωtΨ~(ω,x) dω.\begin{aligned} \widetilde\Psi(\omega,x) &=\int_0^\infty e^{i\omega t}\Psi(t,x)\,dt,\\ \Psi(t,x) &=\frac1{2\pi}\int_{-\infty+i\eta}^{+\infty+i\eta} e^{-i\omega t}\widetilde\Psi(\omega,x)\,d\omega. \end{aligned}

Transform SS the same way. The inverse contour runs left to right. Integration by parts has no initial-data term under the stated assumptions, so

LωΨ~=S~,Lω=d2dx2+ω2−Vℓ(x).L_\omega\widetilde\Psi=\widetilde S, \qquad L_\omega=\frac{d^2}{dx^2}+\omega^2-V_\ell(x).

We seek g(x,x′;ω)g(x,x';\omega) with Lωg=δ(x−x′)L_\omega g=\delta(x-x'), where the operator acts in xx and the source measure is dx′dx'. Its inverse transform is the retarded radial kernel. A real-axis ω+i0\omega+i0 prescription is a boundary value of this construction when that limit exists, not a replacement for specifying a convergent initial contour. The preceding retarded Green-function page explains the spacetime existence and boundary assumptions.

Let uLu_L and uRu_R solve Lωu=0L_\omega u=0, with unit endpoint amplitudes:

uL(x,ω)∼e−iωx(x→−∞),uR(x,ω)∼e+iωx(x→+∞).\begin{aligned} u_L(x,\omega)&\sim e^{-i\omega x} &&(x\to-\infty),\\ u_R(x,\omega)&\sim e^{+i\omega x} &&(x\to+\infty). \end{aligned}

In the upper half-plane each selected wave decays at its own endpoint. The horizon wave combines with time as e−iω(t+x)e^{-i\omega(t+x)}, regular along ingoing characteristics; the outer wave depends on t−xt-x and is outgoing. Continue these solutions from their initial analytic domain when discussing complex resonances. These pure phases apply to the stated massless Schwarzschild master variable, away from the zero-frequency threshold. Kerr requires the horizon frequency ω−mΩH\omega-m\Omega_H and the appropriate spin-dependent radial powers; massive fields require their actual outer wave number and threshold behavior.

For homogeneous solutions define the oriented, unconjugated Wronskian

W[uL,uR]=uLuR′−uRuL′,W′=uLuR′′−uRuL′′=0.W[u_L,u_R]=u_Lu_R'-u_Ru_L', \qquad W'=u_Lu_R''-u_Ru_L''=0.

Primes here denote xx derivatives. Both second derivatives equal (Vℓ−ω2)(V_\ell-\omega^2) times the corresponding solution, so they cancel. This is an algebraic identity between two solutions, not an energy-flux identity involving complex conjugation.

For W(ω)≠0W(\omega)\ne0, impose the left condition below the source and the right condition above it:

g(x,x′;ω)={uL(x)uR(x′)/W,x<x′,uL(x′)uR(x)/W,x>x′.g(x,x';\omega)= \begin{cases} u_L(x)u_R(x')/W,&x\lt x',\\ u_L(x')u_R(x)/W,&x\gt x'. \end{cases}

The two limits agree. Their first derivatives obey

[g]x′=0,[∂xg]x′=uL(x′)uR′(x′)−uR(x′)uL′(x′)W=1,[g]_{x'}=0, \qquad [\partial_xg]_{x'} =\frac{u_L(x')u_R'(x')-u_R(x')u_L'(x')}{W}=1,

where [h]x′=h(x′+)−h(x′−)[h]_{x'}=h(x'+)-h(x'-). A continuous piecewise smooth function has a delta in its second distributional derivative precisely when its first derivative jumps. Thus the homogeneous equation away from x′x' and this unit jump prove Lωg=δL_\omega g=\delta. Equivalently,

g(x,x′;ω)=uL(x<,ω)uR(x>,ω)W(ω),x<=min⁡(x,x′),x>=max⁡(x,x′).g(x,x';\omega) =\frac{u_L(x_<,\omega)u_R(x_>,\omega)}{W(\omega)}, \qquad x_<=\min(x,x'),\quad x_>=\max(x,x').

The product formula also gives g(x,x′;ω)=g(x′,x;ω)g(x,x';\omega)=g(x',x;\omega) for this scalar problem. This spatial transpose symmetry is not a claim that a retarded spacetime kernel is unchanged when source and observation events are interchanged.

Leaver gives the endpoint construction in Leaver 1986, author PDF, § II A, pp. 5–6, Eqs. (6)–(15). His source is −δ-\delta and his Wronskian order is reversed. With L=2GML=2GM, his dimensionless coordinate xˉ=x/L\bar x=x/L, and Laplace variable s=−iLωs=-iL\omega, the conversion is W=−WLeaver/LW=-W_{\rm Leaver}/L and g=−LgLeaverg=-L g_{\rm Leaver}. The page numbers in that citation are the author version’s printed labels, not the journal pagination.

Set Vℓ=0V_\ell=0 on the whole line. The endpoint solutions are exact exponentials, and

W0=2iω,g0(x,x′;ω)=eiω∣x−x′∣2iω.W_0=2i\omega, \qquad g_0(x,x';\omega)=\frac{e^{i\omega|x-x'|}}{2i\omega}.

The kernel has units of length: a second derivative then has the same units as the one-dimensional delta. At ω=iκ\omega=i\kappa, κ>0\kappa\gt0, put

X=κ(x−x′),Y=κg0=−12e−∣X∣.X=\kappa(x-x'),\qquad Y=\kappa g_0=-\frac12e^{-|X|}.

Inspect the common value and the two one-sided tangents in the figure. Since dY/dX=∂xg0dY/dX=\partial_xg_0, their difference is exactly the physical derivative jump.

Two negative endpoint-decaying branches meet continuously at the source, while their slopes change from minus one half to plus one half, producing a unit derivative jump.

The exact whole-line free kernel at ω=iκ\omega=i\kappa, κ>0\kappa\gt0, is Y=−e−∣X∣/2Y=-e^{-|X|}/2 with the scaled axes defined above. Its value is continuous at −1/2-1/2, while the derivative rises from −1/2-1/2 to +1/2+1/2, producing the unit delta source. This is a frequency-domain kernel, not a growing time-domain mode or a quasinormal mode.

Source traceLeft limitRight limitRight minus left
YY−1/2-1/2−1/2-1/200
dY/dXdY/dX−1/2-1/2+1/2+1/211

For an independent time-domain check, let τ=t−t′\tau=t-t' and d=∣x−x′∣d=|x-x'|. The causal free kernel is G0=−Θ(τ−d)/2G_0=-\Theta(\tau-d)/2; directly integrating −12∫d∞eiωτ dτ-\frac12\int_d^\infty e^{i\omega\tau}\,d\tau gives g0g_0 above. Changing the radial operator to −Lω-L_\omega while retaining a positive delta changes the Green function to −g-g.

For an ordinary compact radial source, the solution is

Ψ~(x)=uR(x)W∫−∞xuL(x′)S~(x′) dx′+uL(x)W∫x∞uR(x′)S~(x′) dx′.\begin{aligned} \widetilde\Psi(x) ={}&\frac{u_R(x)}{W} \int_{-\infty}^{x}u_L(x')\widetilde S(x')\,dx'\\ &+\frac{u_L(x)}{W} \int_x^\infty u_R(x')\widetilde S(x')\,dx'. \end{aligned}

On differentiating once, the two terms from the moving integration limit cancel. Differentiating again leaves (uLuR′−uRuL′)S~/W=S~(u_Lu_R'-u_Ru_L')\widetilde S/W=\widetilde S in addition to the homogeneous terms. Beyond the source on the right only uRu_R remains; beyond it on the left only uLu_L remains. This both checks the source and explains how its radiation reaches the two endpoints. A source extending to an endpoint needs its own convergence or regularization argument.

Now allow an interior distributional source

S~(x)=A(x)δ(x−xp)+F(x)δ′(x−xp),\widetilde S(x)=A(x)\delta(x-x_p)+F(x)\delta'(x-x_p),

with smooth A,FA,F and the prime on the delta denoting its coordinate derivative. The product rule for distributions gives

F(x)δ′(x−xp)=F(xp)δ′(x−xp)−F′(xp)δ(x−xp).F(x)\delta'(x-x_p)=F(x_p)\delta'(x-x_p)-F'(x_p)\delta(x-x_p).

For a piecewise smooth field, writing J0=[Ψ~]xpJ_0=[\widetilde\Psi]_{x_p} and J1=[Ψ~′]xpJ_1=[\widetilde\Psi']_{x_p}, the singular part of LωΨ~L_\omega\widetilde\Psi is J0δ′+J1δJ_0\delta'+J_1\delta. Hence

[Ψ~]xp=F(xp),[Ψ~′]xp=A(xp)−F′(xp).[\widetilde\Psi]_{x_p}=F(x_p), \qquad [\widetilde\Psi']_{x_p}=A(x_p)-F'(x_p).

The kernel gives the same field away from the source:

Ψ~(x)=A(xp)g(x,xp)−∂x′[g(x,x′)F(x′)]∣x′=xp,x≠xp.\widetilde\Psi(x) =A(x_p)g(x,x_p) -\left.\partial_{x'}[g(x,x')F(x')]\right|_{x'=x_p}, \qquad x\ne x_p.

At x=xpx=x_p, the source-slot derivative has unequal one-sided limits. Use the limiting fields and the jump conditions; the distributional equation does not select a canonical point value there. In particular, dropping F′(xp)F'(x_p) or differentiating only one arbitrary branch of the coincident kernel changes the source.

Weighted radial operators and source measures

Section titled “Weighted radial operators and source measures”

The same matching method works before a radial equation has been reduced to Schrödinger form. In a coordinate qq, let

D=a2(q)d2dq2+a1(q)ddq+a0(q),a2(q)≠0,\mathcal D=a_2(q)\frac{d^2}{dq^2} +a_1(q)\frac{d}{dq}+a_0(q), \qquad a_2(q)\ne0,

with smooth coefficients on the open interval of interest. Fix one homogeneous condition at each endpoint, assume their solutions vL,vRv_L,v_R are independent, and define Wq=vLvR′−vRvL′W_q=v_Lv_R'-v_Rv_L'. Primes in this section are qq derivatives. Substitution gives Abel’s identity:

Wq′=−a1a2Wq,p(q)=exp⁡ ⁣∫qa1a2 dqˉ,C=pWq=constant.W_q'=-\frac{a_1}{a_2}W_q, \qquad p(q)=\exp\!\int^q\frac{a_1}{a_2}\,d\bar q, \qquad C=pW_q=\text{constant}.

If a kernel is integrated against a specified smooth nonzero density ρ(q′) dq′\rho(q')\,dq', its defining delta must be normalized accordingly:

Dqgρ(q,q′)=δ(q−q′)ρ(q′),gρ(q,q′)=vL(q<)vR(q>)a2(q′)Wq(q′)ρ(q′),y(q)=∫gρ(q,q′)S(q′)ρ(q′) dq′.\begin{aligned} \mathcal D_q g_\rho(q,q')&=\frac{\delta(q-q')}{\rho(q')},\\ g_\rho(q,q') &=\frac{v_L(q_<)v_R(q_>)}{a_2(q')W_q(q')\rho(q')},\\ y(q)&=\int g_\rho(q,q')S(q')\rho(q')\,dq'. \end{aligned}

The kernel is continuous and its derivative jumps by 1/[a2(q′)ρ(q′)]1/[a_2(q')\rho(q')], proving the formula directly. In particular, the ordinary coordinate measure has ρ=1\rho=1.

A useful choice is w=p/a2w=p/a_2, because

Dy=1w[(py′)′+wa0y],gw(q,q′)=vL(q<)vR(q>)C.\mathcal D y =\frac1w\bigl[(p y')'+w a_0y\bigr], \qquad g_w(q,q')=\frac{v_L(q_<)v_R(q_>)}{C}.

This is divergence form, not automatically a self-adjoint operator. The product gives the bilinear symmetry gw(q,q′)=gw(q′,q)g_w(q,q')=g_w(q',q) for these separated scalar boundary conditions; for the coordinate-measure kernel, g1(q,q′)/w(q′)=g1(q′,q)/w(q)g_1(q,q')/w(q')=g_1(q',q)/w(q). A positive Hilbert-space weight, appropriate real coefficients and an adjoint-compatible operator domain require additional analysis. In particular, a complex-frequency pencil or a Teukolsky operator cannot be declared self-adjoint merely because CC is constant.

For the radial Teukolsky equation, write its already-defined algebraic radial term as QsQ_s:

DsR=Δ−sddr(Δs+1R′)+QsR=T.\mathcal D_sR =\Delta^{-s}\frac{d}{dr}\left(\Delta^{s+1}R'\right)+Q_sR=T.

In the subextremal exterior Δ=(r−r+)(r−r−)>0\Delta=(r-r_+)(r-r_-)\gt0. Thus a2=Δa_2=\Delta, a1=(s+1)Δ′a_1=(s+1)\Delta', p=Δs+1p=\Delta^{s+1}, and w=Δsw=\Delta^s. With the actual ingoing and outgoing Teukolsky solutions,

Cs=Δs+1(RinRup′−RupRin′),R(r)=∫r+∞Rin(r<)Rup(r>)Cs T(r′)Δ(r′)s dr′.\begin{aligned} C_s&=\Delta^{s+1}(R^{\rm in}R^{{\rm up}\prime} -R^{\rm up}R^{{\rm in}\prime}),\\ R(r)&=\int_{r_+}^{\infty} \frac{R^{\rm in}(r_<)R^{\rm up}(r_>)}{C_s}\, T(r')\Delta(r')^s\,dr'. \end{aligned}

For gravitational spin weight s=−2s=-2, the source measure is dr′/Δ(r′)2dr'/\Delta(r')^2. This agrees with Fujita 2015, arXiv v2 PDF, § 2, pp. 3–4, Eqs. (5)–(9). Here TT retains the local chapter’s Fourier and field normalization; Fujita packages those mode amplitudes differently. The kernel and source weight are unchanged by a common constant rescaling of RR and TT. Do not replace these radial solutions by the bare Schwarzschild exponentials, or import a physical flux from their raw amplitudes.

A coordinate change that exposes the Jacobian

Section titled “A coordinate change that exposes the Jacobian”

Consider the exact dimensionless problem on 1<q<21\lt q\lt2,

(q2y′′+qy′)=1,y(1)=y(2)=0.(q^2y''+qy')=1,\qquad y(1)=y(2)=0.

Two endpoint solutions are vL=ln⁡qv_L=\ln q and vR=ln⁡(2/q)v_R=\ln(2/q), so Wq=−ln⁡2/qW_q=-\ln2/q, p=qp=q, w=1/qw=1/q, and C=−ln⁡2C=-\ln2. The two kernels are

g1(q,q′)=−ln⁡q< ln⁡(2/q>)q′ln⁡2,gw(q,q′)=−ln⁡q< ln⁡(2/q>)ln⁡2.\begin{aligned} g_1(q,q')&=-\frac{\ln q_<\,\ln(2/q_>)}{q'\ln2},\\ g_w(q,q')&=-\frac{\ln q_<\,\ln(2/q_>)}{\ln2}. \end{aligned}

They produce the same response only with their matching measures:

∫12g1(q,q′) dq′=∫12gw(q,q′) dq′q′=12ln⁡q ln⁡(q/2).\int_1^2 g_1(q,q')\,dq' =\int_1^2 g_w(q,q')\,\frac{dq'}{q'} =\frac12\ln q\,\ln(q/2).

Indeed z=ln⁡qz=\ln q turns q2∂q2+q∂qq^2\partial_q^2+q\partial_q into ∂z2\partial_z^2, and dq/qdq/q becomes dzdz. The answer is just the parabola y=z(z−ln⁡2)/2y=z(z-\ln2)/2 between two Dirichlet walls. If one instead integrates gwg_w against dq′dq', the result solves Dy=q\mathcal D y=q, not Dy=1\mathcal D y=1. A missing source weight changes the forcing, even when the homogeneous solutions and their Wronskian are correct.

Return to the Schwarzschild normalization. At infinity write

uL∼Aouteiωx+Aine−iωx,uR∼eiωx.u_L\sim A_{\rm out}e^{i\omega x} +A_{\rm in}e^{-i\omega x}, \qquad u_R\sim e^{i\omega x}.

Evaluation gives W=2iωAinW=2i\omega A_{\rm in}: the two outgoing terms cancel. Where Ain≠0A_{\rm in}\ne0, the incident-unit scattering solution is uL/Ainu_L/A_{\rm in}, not uLu_L itself. This is the conversion to the In and Up scattering bases; unit incident flux would require a further frequency-dependent factor.

On an analytic continuation sheet, away from thresholds and cuts, suppose the endpoint solutions are holomorphic and nontrivial at ωn\omega_n, with W(ωn)=0W(\omega_n)=0 and ∂ωW(ωn)≠0\partial_\omega W(\omega_n)\ne0. They are then proportional nonzero solutions satisfying both endpoint conditions. The kernel has a simple pole with residue

Resω=ωng=uL(x<,ωn)uR(x>,ωn)∂ωW(ωn).\mathop{\rm Res}_{\omega=\omega_n}g =\frac{u_L(x_<,\omega_n)u_R(x_>,\omega_n)} {\partial_\omega W(\omega_n)}.

This is the local mechanism in Leaver 1986, author PDF, § II B, p. 7, Eqs. (20)–(23). The residue is not identically zero as a kernel, although an observer at a node or a source with zero overlap can miss that pole in a particular response. If angular eigenvalues depend on frequency, the derivative follows the chosen angular branch as well as the radial equation.

Rescaling the two endpoint solutions by nonvanishing holomorphic factors multiplies numerator and Wronskian equally, leaving both the Green function and this residue invariant. Allowing a factor that vanishes at ωn\omega_n can manufacture a Wronskian zero without a pole; see the exercise below. The factor ω\omega in 2iωAin2i\omega A_{\rm in} also makes the zero-frequency threshold a separate question. Neither this local residue calculation nor a list of Wronskian zeros proves a complete mode expansion. Continue to analytic structure for sheets, cuts, and inverse-contour contributions.

A normalization zero. In the free problem, choose ω0≠0\omega_0\ne0 and replace uLu_L by (ω−ω0)uL(\omega-\omega_0)u_L. Does the new zero of its Wronskian describe a resonance?

Solution

The new numerator and denominator both contain ω−ω0\omega-\omega_0. Their quotient remains eiω∣x−x′∣/(2iω)e^{i\omega|x-x'|}/(2i\omega), which is regular at ω0\omega_0 and has zero residue there. The rescaled left solution is identically zero at ω0\omega_0, violating the nontrivial-basis hypothesis. A nonvanishing analytic normalization cannot create this artifact.

A dipole in logarithmic coordinates. For the Dirichlet operator D=q2∂q2+q∂q\mathcal D=q^2\partial_q^2+q\partial_q, replace the unit source by q2δ′(q−qp)q^2\delta'(q-q_p) with 1<qp<21\lt q_p\lt2. Find the two jumps and verify the source after changing to z=ln⁡qz=\ln q.

Solution

For a general operator D\mathcal D and finite jumps J0=[y]J_0=[y], J1=[y′]J_1=[y'], multiplication of the singular derivatives gives

(Dy)sing=a2(qp)J0δ′+[a2(qp)J1+(a1(qp)−a2′(qp))J0]δ.(\mathcal D y)_{\rm sing} =a_2(q_p)J_0\delta' +\left[a_2(q_p)J_1+(a_1(q_p)-a_2'(q_p))J_0\right]\delta.

The prescribed source is qp2δ′(q−qp)−2qpδ(q−qp)q_p^2\delta'(q-q_p)-2q_p\delta(q-q_p). Therefore

[y]qp=1,[y′]qp=−1qp.[y]_{q_p}=1,\qquad [y']_{q_p}=-\frac1{q_p}.

Since yz=qyqy_z=qy_q, the jumps in zz are [y]=1[y]=1 and [yz]=−1[y_z]=-1. The transformed equation is thus yzz=δ′(z−zp)−δ(z−zp)y_{zz}=\delta'(z-z_p)-\delta(z-z_p), with zp=ln⁡qpz_p=\ln q_p. The additional delta is the coordinate correction, not extra physics.

One can also use the weighted kernel directly. For q≠qpq\ne q_p,

y(q)=−∂q′[gw(q,q′) q′]∣q′=qp.y(q) =-\left.\partial_{q'}[g_w(q,q')\,q']\right|_{q'=q_p}.

The factor q′q' is the product of the coefficient q′2q'^2 and the measure density 1/q′1/q'. Omitting that density would give a different source. Taking the left and right limits of this expression reproduces both jumps and satisfies the two endpoint conditions.

  • Fujita, Ryuichi (2015). “Gravitational Waves from a Particle in Circular Orbits around a Rotating Black Hole to the 11th Post-Newtonian Order.” Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics 2015, 033E01. DOI. Open PDF, arXiv v2.
  • Leaver, Edward W. (1986). “Spectral Decomposition of the Perturbation Response of the Schwarzschild Geometry.” Physical Review D 34, 384–408. DOI. Erratum: Physical Review D 38 (1988), 725. Erratum DOI. Open author PDF.