In, Up, Out, and Down Scattering Bases
Scrollable formula. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal hidden content.
Scrollable table. Use Left and Right arrow keys to reveal additional columns.
Scrollable figure. Use Left and Right arrow keys to inspect hidden content.
In and Up specify radiation supplied by the two past boundaries; Out and Down specify radiation received at the two future boundaries. These are two bases of one two-dimensional solution space, not four independent degrees of freedom. For a massless scalar on a subextremal Kerr exterior, we derive their connection matrix, the physical scattering matrix, and the frequency factors that convert amplitudes into fluxes. A solvable interface example checks both ordinary scattering and the superradiant sign.
Required background. PDEs and Green Functions for Gravitation supplies fundamental solution bases and conserved currents.
Helpful background. Black-Hole Geometry and Mechanics fixes horizon generators and asymptotic ends; Formulations of General Relativity supplies the separated radial equations; Events, Intervals, and Minkowski Geometry fixes causal wave orientation; Black-Hole Perturbation Theory supplies the physical master variables.
Scalar radial waves and causal endpoints
Section titled “Scalar radial waves and causal endpoints”Take the exterior of a fixed Kerr black hole, with physical mass , spin length , and . Write
The tortoise coordinate increases from the horizon to infinity. For a separated solution of , use
Here is real, , and the scalar spheroidal harmonic is regular at both poles. Let be the angular eigenvalue in the angular Teukolsky equation, and set . This field rescaling removes the first radial derivative:
Primes hereafter mean . One obtains this equation by substituting into , where , and using . Thus is real and has dimension inverse length squared. At it reduces to , with . The radial rescaling and potential agree with Ottewill and Winstanley 2000, § II, pp. 3–4, Eqs. (2.2), (2.6)–(2.10), PDF; their potential is and their geometrized mass is .
At infinity ; at the horizon , where . Exclude and throughout the traveling-wave construction. The four endpoint components are:
| Component | Radial factor | Causal role |
|---|---|---|
| Infinity input | Arrives from past null infinity | |
| Infinity output | Reaches future null infinity | |
| Horizon input | Emerges from the past horizon | |
| Horizon output | Enters the future horizon |
The last identification does not change when . In ingoing Kerr coordinates and , the complete future-horizon phase becomes times a regular radial factor. Regularity, not the sign of , selects that endpoint. In Schwarzschild, is inward-propagating at both ends, but past-infinity incidence and future-horizon absorption are different boundary roles. The past-horizon channel belongs to the eternal exterior’s scattering problem; it does not assert that a collapsing star emits from a physical past horizon.
The In and Up basis
Section titled “The In and Up basis”Normalize the In solution to unit amplitude from past null infinity:
There is no component emerging from the past horizon. Normalize the Up solution to unit emergence from the past horizon:
There is no input from past null infinity. Superscripts label solutions; subscripts on and label reflection coefficients. These are the source’s and , respectively (Ottewill and Winstanley 2000, § II, p. 4, Eq. (2.11), PDF).
Assume these finite incident normalizations exist. For the endpoint-normalized solutions at the horizon and at infinity, this requires a nonzero Wronskian. Indeed, writing at infinity gives . Then . This connects the present normalization to mode Green functions. It also identifies what would fail if the incident coefficient vanished.
The Out and Down basis
Section titled “The Out and Down basis”Because is real at fixed , conjugating the radial function gives another solution of the same radial equation. Define
The endpoint terms fix the causal interpretation without relying on the name. For Out, the unit term travels from the interaction region to future null infinity; the term is supplied from past null infinity, while emerges from the past horizon. For Down, the unit term enters the future horizon; the and terms are supplied from the past horizon and past null infinity, respectively. Thus is normalized by one unit future output at infinity or at the horizon.
Conjugating the complete spacetime mode instead flips both to , with the corresponding angular phase convention. The future endpoint interpretation is also explicit in Ottewill and Winstanley 2000, § III B, pp. 7–8, Eqs. (3.8), (3.10), PDF; here we retain classical amplitudes, not quantum mode normalizations. In the diagram, inspect the bold unit arrows: In and Up fix one past input; Out and Down fix one future output.
The four real-frequency radial solutions on a schematic tortoise-coordinate line. The horizon waves use and the infinity waves use . Arrow direction labels the causal endpoint component, not the sign of -energy flux: in the superradiant band the future-horizon wave is still ingoing even though that energy flux is negative. The barrier shape and distances are not to scale, and the conjugation relation applies only to the stated real radial equation.
Scattering matrix versus basis connection
Section titled “Scattering matrix versus basis connection”Let be the two past-input amplitudes and the two future-output amplitudes. A general solution has
Reading the output coefficients of In and Up gives the physical scattering map:
By contrast, the relation between columns of basis functions is
Its first row is : the two coefficients reproduce the two outputs. Consequently
The transpose comes from the distinction between a list of functions and the coefficients multiplying that list. These matrices are not the transfer matrix that relates two traveling-wave coefficients at one spatial end to the two at the other.
Use . If , then
The radial equation makes . Evaluating at the two ends gives
Thus amplitude reciprocity includes a frequency factor: . Since the future pair is the conjugate of the past pair,
This uses a nondegenerate pair, hence . The determinant is a phase, not necessarily .
Conserved current and signed flux normalization
Section titled “Conserved current and signed flux normalization”For this real radial equation,
For , the cross terms cancel and . Evaluating the current of each incident solution, and the mixed Wronskian , gives
Together with transmission reciprocity, these are the four relations in Ottewill and Winstanley 2000, § II, p. 4, Eq. (2.12), PDF. The mixed identity matters: checking In and Up separately does not check the interference of arbitrary coherent inputs.
For the general solution, the endpoint currents are and . Equating them yields
At fixed positive , the scalar -energy current is a common positive multiple of . In particular, the energy absorbed by the hole from an In wave is proportional to . It is negative when : the outgoing energy at infinity exceeds the incident energy. The causal horizon wave is still the future-ingoing one.
Unit incident amplitude therefore is not unit flux. Define amplitudes measured in units of absolute current by
Then
For , is unitary and symmetric in this phase convention. For , it preserves an indefinite form instead; replacing by in would erase superradiance. Equivalently, divide In and Out by , and Up and Down by , to obtain unit absolute-current basis functions. The extra common factor converts current to energy normalization at fixed frequency.
An exactly solvable interface check
Section titled “An exactly solvable interface check”To test the algebra without a numerical Kerr solver, replace the radial coefficient by a step and a delta barrier:
Here , , and is real; all three have dimension inverse length. This is a prescribed real radial matching model, not a Kerr potential or a claim about its mode stability. Retain the same causal endpoint labels. Distributional matching requires
For In these conditions read and . Solving this pair, and the corresponding Up pair, gives
The common denominator must be nonzero. For any length , two exact checks with and are:
| Reflected fraction | Absorbed fraction | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
The last two columns are and , and sum to one in each row. For and , both transmissions are and both reflections vanish: with the infinity/horizon channel order, exchanges the channels rather than being the identity. For and , the denominator vanishes. An outgoing-only solution then exists in this model, so the unit-incidence construction is singular. This exception is not evidence for a real-frequency Kerr mode.
Limits of the traveling-wave construction
Section titled “Limits of the traveling-wave construction”At , the horizon exponentials coincide and unit flux normalization is singular. A regular threshold basis or a controlled limit is needed. The same warning applies at . For a massive field of mass , the infinity wavenumber becomes ; its threshold and below-threshold exponentials require new endpoint conditions and an explicit branch choice.
For complex frequency, conjugation generally does not give a second solution at the same spectral parameter. An absorbing medium or a complex effective radial potential also invalidates this simple current argument. Spin-weighted Teukolsky functions have different radial powers and flux conversions; use their actual equations and identities, not these bare scalar coefficients. See physical Teukolsky radial solutions and reflection, transmission, and absorption.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”Recover a mixed identity. Evaluate at both ends. Why do the two separate incident flux balances not replace this check?
Solution
At infinity only the pairing of with survives. At the horizon only the pairing of with survives. Therefore
The separate flux balances give the diagonal entries of ; this Wronskian gives its off-diagonal entry and controls interference. Taking removes the transmission frequency factor but does not generally make the two complex reflection amplitudes equal.
Move the tortoise origin. Replace by , with real constant , and reimpose unit incident amplitudes using exponentials in . Find the changes in all four coefficients. Which fluxes change?
Solution
Substitute into each endpoint formula. Multiply the old In solution by and the old Up solution by to restore their unit inputs. The new coefficients are
All four magnitudes, hence the single-channel flux fractions, are unchanged. Transmission reciprocity survives because both transmissions acquire the same phase. Scattering phases require a declared coordinate and endpoint phase convention even when flux ratios do not.
References
Section titled “References”- Ottewill, A. C., and Winstanley, E. (2000). “The renormalized stress tensor in Kerr space-time: general results.” Physical Review D 62, 084018. DOI. Open PDF, arXiv:gr-qc/0004022v2; cited page numbers are this version’s printed labels.